End seals in squeeze film dampers (SFDs) aid to increase their damping capability while maintaining low lubricant flow rates and reducing the severity of air ingestion. This paper presents measurements of the forced response in a SFD integrating a contacting end seal and with closed flow ports, i.e., no lubricant through flow. The system motion is nonlinear due to the dry-friction interaction at the mechanical seal mating surfaces. Single parameter characterization of the test system would yield an equivalent viscous damping coefficient that is both frequency and motion amplitude dependent. Presently, an identification method suited for nonlinear systems allows determining simultaneously the squeeze film damping and inertia force coefficients and the seal dry-friction force. The identification procedure shows similar (within 10%) force coefficients than those obtained with a more involved two-step procedure that first requires measurements without any lubricant in the test system. The identified SFD damping and inertia force coefficients agree well with model predictions that account for end flow effects at recirculation grooves. The overall test results demonstrate that the nonrotating end seal effectively eliminates side leakage and avoids air ingestion, thus maintaining a consistent damping performance throughout the test frequency range. The nonlinear identification procedure saves time and resources while producing reliable physical parameter estimations.

1.
Cooper
,
S.
, 1963, “
Preliminary Investigation of Oil Films for Control of Vibration
,”
Proceedings of the Lubrication and Wear Convention
,
London
,
Institute of Mechanical Engineers
, pp.
305
315
, Paper No. 28.
2.
Della Pietra
,
L.
, and
Adiletta
,
G.
, 2002, “
The Squeeze Film Damper Over Four Decades of Investigations. Part I: Characteristics and Operating Features
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
0583-1024,
34
(
1
), pp.
3
26
.
3.
Della Pietra
,
L.
, and
Adiletta
,
G.
, 2002, “
The Squeeze Film Damper Over Four Decades of Investigations. Part II: Rotordynamic Analyses With Rigid and Flexible Rotors
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
0583-1024,
34
(
2
), pp.
97
126
.
4.
Diaz
,
S.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 1999, “
Reduction of the Dynamic Load Capacity in a Squeeze Film Damper Operating With a Bubbly Lubricant
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
121
, pp.
703
709
.
5.
Zeidan
,
F. Y.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1996, “
Design and Application of Squeeze Film Dampers in Rotating Machinery
,”
Proceedings of the 25th Turbomachinery Symposium
,
Houston, TX
, Sept. 16–19, pp.
169
188
.
6.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Delgado
,
A.
, 2007, “
Identification of Force Coefficients in a Squeeze Film Damper With a Mechanical End Seal. Part I: Unidirectional Load Tests
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
129
(
3
), pp.
858
864
.
7.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Delgado
,
A.
, 2007, “
Identification of Force Coefficients in a Squeeze Film Damper With a Mechanical End Seal–Centered Circular Orbit Tests
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
129
(
3
), pp.
660
668
.
8.
Tiwari
,
R.
,
Lees
,
A. W.
, and
Friswell
,
M. I.
, 2004, “
Identification of Dynamic Bearing Parameters: A Review
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
0583-1024,
36
(
2
), pp.
99
124
.
9.
Rice
,
H. J.
, and
Fitzpatrick
,
J. A.
, 1991, “
Procedure for the Identification of Linear and Non-Linear Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
149
(
3
), pp.
397
411
.
10.
Fitzpatrick
,
J. A.
, and
Rice
,
H. J.
, 1988, “
Simplified Partial Coherence Functions for Multiple Input/Output Analysis
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
122
(
1
), pp.
171
174
. 0022-460X
11.
Rice
,
H. J.
, and
Xu
,
K. Q.
, 1996, “
Linear Path Identification of General Non-Linear Systems
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
0888-3270,
10
(
1
), pp.
55
63
.
12.
Adams
,
D. E.
, and
Allemang
,
R. J.
, 2000, “
A Frequency Domain Method for Estimating the Parameters of a Non-Linear Structural Dynamic Model Through Feedback
,”
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
0888-3270,
14
(
4
), pp.
637
656
.
13.
Yang
,
C.
,
Adams
,
D. E.
, and
Ciray
,
S.
, 2005, “
System Identification of Non-Linear Mechanical Systems Using Embedded Sensitivity Functions
,”
Trans. ASME, J. Vib. Acoust.
1048-9002,
127
(
6
), pp.
530
541
.
14.
Yang
,
C.
,
Adams
,
D. E.
, and
Yoo
,
S. W.
, 2003, “
Diagnosing Vibration Problems With Embedded Sensitivity Functions
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
37
(
4
), pp.
12
17
. 0022-460X
15.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Aguilar
,
R.
, 2000, “
Leakage and Dynamic Response of a Hybrid Brush Seal-Gas Damper Seal
,”
Texas A&M University
, Research Progress Report No. TRC-SEAL-3-00.
16.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Delgado
,
A.
, 2007, “
Parameter Identification of an End Sealed SFD. Part II: Improved Predictions of Added Mass Coefficients for Grooved SFDs and Oil Seals
,”
TRC
, Report No. TRC-SFD-2-07.
17.
Ginsberg
,
J. H.
, 2001,
Mechanical and Structural Vibrations
,
Wiley
,
New York
, pp.
135
139
.
You do not currently have access to this content.