An experimental investigation of the forced convective heat transfer of individual and arrays of multiple two-dimensional obstacles is reported. The airflow rate was varied from 800 ≤ ReDh ≤ 13000. The effects upon the Nusselt numbers and obstacle temperature differences of parametric changes in the Reynolds number, channel height, array configuration, and input heat flux are established. The input heat fluxes to the obstacles ranged from 950 ≤ q″ ≤ 20200 W/m2, which significantly extends beyond that seen in the open literature for forced convective air cooling of simulated electronic components. Comparisons of the obstacle mean Nusselt numbers are made with a two-dimensional laminar numerical model employing the Navier-Stokes equations. A set of correlations characterizing the heat transfer from the protruding heat sources within the channel is obtained. It was found that the obstacle temperature, the critical measure for electronic device failure, must be shown along with the corresponding Nusselt number to fully characterize the thermal state of the heated obstacle as the ratio definition of the Nusselt number can obscure large temperature increases. The results find that the proper placement of geometrically dissimilar obstacles, such as a taller obstacle, can be used to passively enhance the heat transfer in its vicinity. This effect would be dependent upon the flow rate and geometries in order to control the reattachment zones and their subsequent convective augmentation. The experimental results are found to be in good agreement with the results from the numerical simulation. Finally, a set of pertinent correlations for the arrays of channel mounted obstacles is given.

1.
Arvizu, D. E., and Moffat, R. J., 1981, “Experimental heat transfer from an array of heated cubical elements on an adiabatic channel wall,” Report HMT-33, Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
2.
Cess
R. D.
, and
Shaffer
E. C.
,
1959
a, “
Heat Transfer to Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates with a Prescribed Wall Heat Flux
,”
Applied Scientific Research
, Vol.
A8
, pp.
339
344
.
3.
Cess
R. D.
, and
Shaffer
E. C.
,
1959
b, “
Summary of Laminar Heat Transfer Between Parallel Plates with Unsymmetrical Wall Temperatures
,”
J. Aero Space Sciences
, Vol.
26
, p.
538
538
.
4.
Davalath
J.
, and
Bayazitoglu
Y.
,
1987
,
Forced Convection Cooling Across Rectangular Blocks
,
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
109
, pp.
321
328
.
5.
FIDAP, 1993, Theory Manual, Fluid Dynamics International, Evanston, IL.
6.
Garimella
S. V.
, and
Eibeck
P. A.
,
1990
,
Heat Transfer Characteristics of an Array of Protruding Elements in Single-Phase Forced Convection
,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
33
, pp.
2659
2669
.
7.
Jubran
B. A.
,
Swiety
S. A.
, and
Hamdan
M. A.
,
1996
, “
Convective heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of various array configurations to simulate the cooling of electronic modules
,”
Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
39
, pp.
3519
3529
.
8.
Jubran
B. A.
, and
Al-Salaymeh
A. S.
,
1996
, “
Heat transfer enhancement in electronic modules using ribs and ’film-cooling-like’ techniques
,”
Int. J. of Heat and Fluid Flow
, Vol.
17
, pp.
148
154
.
9.
Kline, S. J., and McClintock, F. A., 1953, “Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments,” Mechanical Engineering, Jan., pp. 3–8.
10.
Lehmann
G. L.
, and
Pembroke
J.
,
1996
,
Forced Convection Air Cooling of Simulated Low Profile Electronic Components: Part 1—Base Case
,
ASME Journal of Electronic Packaging
, Vol.
113
, pp.
21
26
.
11.
Mahef key, E. T., 1995, “High temperature (500–600 K) power electronics thermal management,” Proc. 12th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power and Propulsion, American Institute of Physics, New York, pp. 917–929.
12.
McEntire
A. B.
, and
Webb
B. W.
,
1990
, “
Local forced convective heat transfer from protruding and flush-mounted two-dimensional discrete heat sources
,”
Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
33
, pp.
1521
1533
.
13.
Moffat
R. J.
,
1988
, “
Describing the uncertainties in experimental results
,”
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
, Vol.
1
, pp.
3
17
.
14.
Molki
M.
,
Faghri
M.
, and
Ozbay
O.
,
1995
, “
A Correlation for Heat Transfer and Wake Effect in the Entrance Region of an In-Line Array of Rectangular Blocks Simulating Electronic Components
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
117
, pp.
40
46
.
15.
Peterson
G. P.
, and
Ortega
A.
,
1990
,”
Thermal control of electronic equipment and devices
,”
Advances in Heat Transfer
, Vol.
20
, J. P. Hartnett and T. F. Irvine, eds., Academic Press, San Diego, pp.
181
314
.
16.
Roeller
P. T.
,
Stevens
J.
, and
Webb
B. W.
,
1991
, “
Heat Transfer and Turbulent Flow Characteristics of Isolated Three-Dimensional Protrusions in Channels
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
113
, pp.
597
603
.
17.
Sparrow
E. M.
,
Yanezmoreno
A. A.
, and
Otis
D. R.
,
1984
, “
Convective heat transfer response to height differences in an array of block-like electronic components
,”
Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
27
, pp.
469
473
.
18.
U. S. Department of Defense, 1991, “Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment,” Military Handbook MIL-HDBK-217F, Washington, DC, Chapter 6.
19.
Vafai
K.
, and
Kim
S. J.
,
1990
,
Analysis of Surface Enhancement by a Porous Substrate
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
112
, pp.
700
705
.
20.
Young
T. J.
, and
Vafai
K.
,
1998
a, “
Convective Cooling of a Heated Obstacle in a Channel
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
41
, pp.
3131
3148
.
21.
Young
T. J.
, and
Vafai
K.
,
1998
b, “
Convective flow and heat transfer in a channel containing multiple heated obstacles
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
41
, pp.
3279
3298
.
22.
Zebib
A.
, and
Wo
Y. K.
,
1989
,
A Two-Dimensional Conjugate Heat Transfer Model for Forced Air Cooling of an Electronic Device
,
ASME Journal of Electronic Packaging
, Vol.
III
, pp.
41
45
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.