An experimental study concerning the performance of a rectangular fin in both dry and wet condition was carried out. The visual observation of the dehumidifying phenomenon identified four regions, including the fully dry, very fine droplet, larger droplet, and film-like region. Experimental results showed that the effect of dry bulb temperature on the wet fin efficiency is very small. The dry fin efficiency is about 15–25 percent higher than that of the corresponding wet fin efficiency. For fully wet condition, the effect of relative humidity on the fully wet fin efficiency is also small. For partially wet surface, a considerable influence of the relative humidity on the fin efficiency is encountered. Test results for the fully wet fin efficiency agree well with some of the previous studies but disagree with some of the previous investigations. The main cause to this controversy may be attributed to the formulation of the relation between the humidity ratio and the fin temperature. The fully wet fin efficiency decrease slightly with increase of fin base temperature. However, the effect of fin base temperature on the dry fin efficiency is relatively small.

Issue Section:
Extended Surfaces
Keywords:
humidity, heat transfer, drops, Dehumidification, Finned Surfaces, Heat Transfer
Topics:
Dehumidification, Heat transfer, Temperature, Visualization, Drops
1.
ARI standard 410-91, 1991, “Forced-Circulation Air-Cooling and Air-Heating Coils,” Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration Institute, Arlington.
2.
O’Brien
,
N. G.
, and
Turner
,
R. L.
,
1963
, “
Fin Thermal Efficiency During Simultaneous Heat Mass Transfer
,”
AIChE J.
,
11
, pp.
546
–
548
.
3.
Threlkeld, J. L., 1970, Thermal Environmental Engineering, New-York: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
4.
McQuiston
,
F. C.
,
1975
, “
Fin Efficiency With Combined Heat and Mass Transfer
,”
ASHRAE J.
,
81, Part 1
, pp.
350
–
355
.
5.
Elmahdy
,
A. H.
, and
Biggs
,
R. C.
,
1983
, “
Efficiency of Extended Surfaces With Simultaneous Heat Transfer and Mass Transfer
,”
ASHRAE J.
,
89, Part 1A
, pp.
135
–
143
.
6.
Coney
,
J. E. R.
,
Kazeminejad
,
H.
, and
Sheppard
,
C. G. W.
,
1989
, “
Dehumidification of Air on a Vertical Rectangular Fin: A Numerical Study
,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs,
J. of Mechanical Engng. Sci
,
203
, pp.
165
–
175
.
7.
Coney
,
J. E. R.
,
Kazeminejad
,
H.
, and
Sheppard
,
C. G. W.
,
1989
, “
Dehumidification of Turbulent Air Flow Over a Thick Fin: An Experimental Study
,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs,
J. of Mechanical Engng. Sci
,
203
, pp.
177
–
188
.
8.
Coney
,
J. E. R.
,
Sheppard
,
C. G. W.
, and
El-Shafei
,
E. A. M.
,
1989
, “
Fin Performance With Condensation From Humid Air: A Numerical Study
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
10
, pp.
224
–
231
.
9.
Chen
,
L. T.
,
1991
, “
Two-Dimensional Fin Efficiency With Combined Heat and Mass Transfer Between Water-Wetted Fin Surface and Moving Moist Airstream
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
12
, pp.
71
–
76
.
10.
Kazeminejad
,
H.
,
1995
, “
Analysis of One-Dimensional Fin Assembly Heat Transfer With Dehumidification
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
38
, pp.
455
–
462
.
11.
Wu
,
G.
, and
Bong
,
T. Y.
,
1994
, “
Overall Efficiency of a Straight Fin With Combined Heat and Mass Transfer
,”
ASHRAE J.
,
100, Part 1
, pp.
367
–
374
.
12.
Hong, T. K., and Webb, R. L., 1996, “Calculation of Fin Efficiency for Wet and Dry Fins,” ISSN 1078-9669,2, No. 1, pp. 27–41.
13.
Salah El-Din
,
M. M.
,
1998
, “
Performance Analysis of Partially-Wet Fin Assembly
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
18
, pp.
337
–
349
.
14.
Rosario
,
L.
, and
Rahman
,
M. M.
,
1998
, “
Overall Efficiency of a Radial Fin Assembly Under Dehumidifying Conditions
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
120
, pp.
299
–
304
.
15.
Rosario
,
L.
, and
Rahman
,
M. M.
,
1999
, “
Analysis of Heat Transfer in a Partially Wet Radial Fin Assembly During Dehumidification
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
20
, pp.
642
–
648
.
16.
Besednjak
,
A.
, and
Poredosˇ
,
A.
,
1998
, “
Efficiency of Cooled Extended Surfaces
,”
Int. J. Refrig.
,
21
, pp.
372
–
380
.
17.
Liang
,
S. Y.
,
Wong
,
T. N.
, and
Nathan
,
G. K.
,
2000
, “
Comparison of One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Models for Wet-surface Fin efficiency of a Plate-Fin-Tube Heat Exchanger
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
20
, pp.
941
–
962
.
18.
Ware, C. D., and Hacha, T. H., 1960, “Heat Transfer From Humid Air to Fin and Tube Extended Surface Cooling Coils,” ASME Paper 60-HT-17.
19.
ASHRAE Standard 33–78, 1978, “Method of Testing Forced Circulation Air Cooling and Air Heating Coils,” American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA.
20.
ASHRAE Standard 41.1-1986, 1986, “Standard Method for Temperature Measurement,” American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA.
21.
ASHRAE Standard 41.2-1987, 1987, “Standard Methods for Laboratory Air-Flow Measurement,” American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA.
22.
Chilton
,
T. H.
, and
Colburn
,
A. P.
,
1934
, “
Mass Transfer Coefficients
,”
Int. Eng. Chem.
,
26
, pp.
1183
–
1187
.
23.
Kandlikar, S. G., 1990, “Thermal Design Theory for Compact Evaporators,” in Compact Heat Exchangers, R. K. Kraus et al., eds., Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, pp. 245–286.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.