The need for rapid, low-cost die fabrication and modification methods is greater than ever in the sheet metal forming sector of industry. Consequently, three fabrication methods, suitable for rapid die development schemes, are being compared experimentally based on cost, lead-time, shape resolution and flexibility issues. The candidate methods include CNC-machining a solid billet of material (standard method), assembling and clamping an array of profiled-edge laminations (PEL), and configuring and clamping a matrix of closely-packed pins (discrete die). A matched-set of forming dies was made using each of the candidate fabrication methods for stamping an FEA-verified benchmark part out of steel sheet. Based on the stamping experiments, a PEL die is shown to be similar to CNC-machined dies except that most tooling accessibility problems are eliminated, die geometry limitations are reduced and faster fabrication is possible for harder tool materials. When compared with CNC-machined dies, the discrete die method limits part shape fidelity, maximum forming loads, die geometry and blankholder incorporation. However, the discrete die method excels over the other two methods in terms of lower cost and faster fabrication time. The results of this study make a strong case for the sheet metal forming sector of industry to actively implement the PEL and discrete die methods in their manufacturing operations.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Papers
A Comparison of Rapid Fabrication Methods for Sheet Metal Forming Dies
D. F. Walczyk,
D. F. Walczyk
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590
Search for other works by this author on:
D. E. Hardt
D. E. Hardt
Laboratory for Manufacturing and Productivity, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Search for other works by this author on:
D. F. Walczyk
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590
D. E. Hardt
Laboratory for Manufacturing and Productivity, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. May 1999, 121(2): 214-224 (11 pages)
Published Online: May 1, 1999
Article history
Received:
September 1, 1997
Revised:
April 1, 1998
Online:
January 17, 2008
Citation
Walczyk, D. F., and Hardt, D. E. (May 1, 1999). "A Comparison of Rapid Fabrication Methods for Sheet Metal Forming Dies." ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. May 1999; 121(2): 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2831208
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Rapid Tooling for Sheet Metal Forming Using Profiled Edge Laminations—Design Principles and Demonstration
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (November,1998)
Advances in Sheet Forming—Materials Modeling, Numerical Simulation, and Press Technologies
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (December,2011)
Investigation and Correction of Surface Distortion in Dies With Typical Depression Features
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (August,2011)
Development of a Computer-Aided Manufacturing System for Profiled Edge Lamination Tooling
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (August,2002)
Related Chapters
Cut Edge Behavior
New Advanced High Strength Steels: Optimizing Properties
Part III Some Practical Advice
The Elements of Mechanical Design
Getting Ready for Production
Total Quality Development: A Step by Step Guide to World Class Concurrent Engineering