In this paper the design of a multi-finger force-reflecting haptic interface device for teleoperational grasping is introduced. The haptic interface or “master” controller device is worn on the human operator’s hand and measured human finger positions are used to control the finger positions of a remote grasping manipulator or “slave” device. The slave may be a physical robotic grasping manipulator, or a computer generated representation of a human hand such as used in virtual reality applications. The forces measured by the robotic slave, or calculated for the virtual slave, are presented to the operator’s fingertips through the master providing a means for deeper human sensation of presence and better control of grasping tasks in the slave environments. Design parameters and performance measures for haptic interfaces for teleoperation are discussed. One key performance issue involving the high-speed display of forces during initial contact, especially when interacting with rigid surfaces, is addressed by the present design, reducing slave controller computation requirements and overcoming actuator response time constraints. The design presented utilizes a planar four-bar linkage for each finger, to represent each finger bend motion as a single degree of freedom, and to provide a finger bend resistance force that is substantially perpendicular to the distal finger pad throughout the full 180 degrees of finger bend motion represented. The finger linkage design, in combination with a remote position measurement and force display assembly, provides a very lightweight and low inertia system with a large workspace. The concept of a replicated finger is introduced which, in combination with a decoupled actuator and feed forward control, provides improved performance in transparent free motion, and rapid, stable touch sensation of initial contact with rigid surfaces. A distributed computation architecture with a PC based haptic interface controller and associated control algorithms are also discussed.

1.
Burdea, G., 1996, Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
2.
Shimoga, K., Murray, A., and Khosla, P., 1996, A Touch Display System for Interaction with Remote and Virtual Environments, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, DSC-Vol. 58, ASME, New York, NY, pp. 523–529.
3.
Colgate, J., Grafing, P., Stanley, C., and Schenkel, G., 1993, Implementation of Stiff Virtual Walls in Force Reflecting Interfaces, Proceedings of Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, IEEE Neural Networks Council, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 202–215.
4.
Kazerooni, H., 1993, Human Induced Instability in Haptic Interfaces, Proceedings of the 1993 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, DSC-Vol. 49, pp. 15–27.
5.
Klatzky, R., Purdy, K., and Lederman, S., 1996, When is Vision Useful During a Familiar Manipulatory Task ?, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, DSC-Vol. 58, ASME, New York, NY, pp. 561–566.
6.
Schulteis, T., Dupont, P., Millman, P., and Howe, R., 1996, Automatic Identification of Remote Environments, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, DSC-Vol. 58, ASME, New York, NY, pp. 451–458.
7.
Lawrence, D., Salada, M., Lucy, P., and Doughtery, A., 1996, Quantitative Experimental Analysis of Transparency and Stability in Haptic Interfaces, Proceedings of the 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, DSC-Vol. 58, ASME, New York, NY, pp. 441–449.
8.
Springer, S., and Ferrier, N., 1999, A New Method for Design and Control of Haptic Interfaces for Display of Rigid Surfaces, Presented at the 1999 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 1999, Nashville, TN, ASME, New York, NY.
9.
Salcudean, S. E., and Vlaar, T. D., 1994, On the Emulation of Stiff Walls and Static Friction with a Magnetically Levitated Input/Output Device, Proceedings of the 1994 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, DSC-Vol. 55, ASME, New York, NY, pp. 303–309.
10.
Okamura, A. M., Dennerlein, J. T., and Howe, R. D., 1998, Vibration Feedback Models for Virtual Environments, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 3, pp. 2485–2490.
11.
Moreya, M., and Hannaford, B., 1998, A Practical measure of Dynamic Response of Haptic Devices, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1-369-374.
12.
Fifth Dimension web page, http://www.5dt.com.
13.
Springer, S., and Gadh, R., 1997, Haptic Feedback for Virtual Reality Computer Aided Design, Presented at the 1997 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 1997, Dallas, TX, ASME, New York, NY.
14.
Kramer, J., 1993, Force Feedback and Textures Simulating Interface Device, U.S. Patent No. 5,184,319, USPO.
15.
Virtual Technologies, Inc., 1997, company web page http://www.virtex.com
16.
Springer
,
S.
, and
Gadh
,
R.
,
1996
, State-of-the-art Virtual Reality Hardware for Computer-aided-design,
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
,
7
, pp.
457
465
.
17.
Cutkosky, M., and Howe, R., 1990, “Human Grasp Choice and Robotic Grasp Analysis,” in S. Venkataraman and T. Iberall, Editors, Dextrous Robotic Hands, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 5–31.
18.
Ascension Company web page, http://www.ascension-tech.com/.
19.
Springer, S., 2000, “Haptic Display for Tele-robotics and Virtual Reality,” Doctoral dissertation at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
20.
Springer, S., and Ferrier, N., 2000, DECAFF: Experimental Study on Human Haptic Perception, Presented at the 2000 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 2000, Orlando, FL, ASME, New York, NY.
You do not currently have access to this content.