There are often discrepancies in how a product is perceived in the different display media employed in typical product development processes. Product developers in many cases rely on different display media for design realizations. This study investigates if and how perceptual discrepancies change across different media and design groups. An experiment was designed and conducted at Virginia Tech to compare the perceptual differences of a simplified model of a car across three types of representation media: industrial design sketches, Computer aided design (CAD) models, and physical prototypes. The geometry of the car window was varied to simulate two visual illusions; architrave and irradiation. Two groups (industrial designers and engineers) with varying levels of experience (students and professionals) were studied. The experimental results were analyzed by applying a two-step data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to identify the trends of how the shape perception varied within and across the subject groups. This study and its findings are particularly important in several ways. First, the DEA approach provides an objective comparison of groups when differences in the participants’ evaluation skills and experience levels should be explicitly taken into account, important to understanding student learning and effectiveness of practitioners. Our study has shown that designers’ perceptual evaluation strategies change significantly across the groups. Findings of this study can be used for understanding perceptual discrepancies across media and groups in product design and development and could help to inform new approaches to design education research.

1.
Oppel
,
J. J.
, 1854-1855,
Über geometrisch-optische Tauschungen
.
Jahresberict des Frankfurter Vereins
, Frankfurt, Germany.
2.
Mary
,
S.
, 1973, “
Tests of the ‘Carpentered World’: Hypothesis by Race and Environment in America and Zambia
,”
International Journal of Psychology
,
8
, pp.
83
94
.
3.
Hubbold
,
R.
,
Murta
,
A.
,
West
,
A.
, and
Howard
,
T.
, 1995, “
Design Issues for Virtual Reality Systems
,”
Proceedings of the First Eurographics Workshop on Virtual Environments
, pp.
224
236
.
4.
McNamara
,
A. M.
, 2005, “
Exploring Perceptual Equivalence Between Real and Simulated Imagery
,”
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
, Vol.
95
, pp.
123
128
.
5.
Kim
,
S.
,
Hagh-Shenas
,
H.
, and
Interrante
,
V.
, 2004, “
Conveying Three-Dimensional Shape With Texture
,”
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
, Vol.
73
, pp.
119
122
, New York.
6.
Weiskopf
,
D.
, and
Hauser
,
H.
, 2006, “
GPU Rendering - Cycle Shading for the Assessment and Visualization of Shape in One and Two Codimensions
,”
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
, Vol.
137
, pp.
219
226
.
7.
Sweet
,
G.
, and
Ware
,
C.
, 2004, “
View Direction, Surface Orientation and Texture Orientation for Perception of Surface Shape
,”
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
, Vol.
62
, pp.
97
106
.
8.
Ferwerda
,
J. A.
,
Westin
,
S. H.
,
Smith
,
R. C.
, and
Pawlicki
,
R.
, 2004, “
Effects of Rendering on Shape Perception in Automobile Design
,”
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
, Vol.
73
, pp.
107
114
.
9.
Söderman
,
M.
, 2005, “
Virtual Reality in Product Evaluations With Potential Customers: An Exploratory Study Comparing Virtual Reality With Conventional Product Representations
,”
J. Eng. Design
0954-4828,
16
, pp.
311
328
.
10.
Rolland
,
J. P.
,
Burbeck
,
C. A.
,
Gibson
,
W.
, and
Ariely
,
D.
, 1993, “
Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in 3D Virtual Environments
,”
Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
,
4
, pp.
24
49
.
11.
Gregory
,
R. L.
, 1997, “
Knowledge in Perception and Illusion
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
0962-8436,
352
, pp.
1121
1127
.
12.
Coren
,
S.
, and
Girgus
,
J. S.
, 1978,
Seeing is Deceiving: The Psychology of Visual Illusions
.
John Wiley & Sons
, New York.
13.
Jahoda
,
G.
, and
Barrie
,
S.
, 1970, “
Susceptibility to Geometrical Illusions According to Culture and Professional Training
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
0031-5117,
7
, pp.
179
184
.
14.
Miller
,
R. J.
, 2001, “
Gender Differences in Illusion Response: The Influence of Spatial Strategy and Sex Ratio
,”
Sex Roles
,
44
, pp.
209
225
.
15.
Ramanathan
,
R.
, 2003,
An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement
,
Sage Publications
, Thousand Oaks, CA.
16.
Silkman
,
R. H.
, 1986, “
Editor’s Notes
,” in
Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis
,
R. H.
Silkman
, ed.,
Jossey-Bass Publishers
, San Francisco.
17.
Sexton
,
T. R.
, 1986, “
The Methodology of Data Envelopment Analysis
,” in
Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis
,
R. H.
Silkman
, ed.,
Jossey-Bass Publishers
, San Francisco.
18.
Thanassoulis
,
E.
, 2001,
Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis
,
Kluwer Academic Publishers
, Norwell, MA.
19.
Golany
,
B.
, and
Roll
,
Y.
, 1989, “
An Application Procedure for DEA
,”
Omega
0305-0483,
17
, pp.
237
250
.
20.
Cooper
,
W. W.
,
Seiford
,
L. M.
, and
Tone
,
K.
, 2000,
Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software
,
Kluwer Academic Publishers
, Norwell, MA.
21.
Dyson
,
R. G.
,
Allen
,
R.
,
Camanho
,
A. S.
,
Podinovski
,
V. V.
,
Sarrico
,
C.-S.
, and
Shale
,
E. A.
, 2001, “
Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA
,”
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
0377-2217,
132
, pp.
245
259
.
22.
Callen
,
J. L.
, 1991, “
Data Envelopment Analysis: Partial Survey and Applications for Management Accounting
,”
Journal of Management Accounting
,
3
, pp.
35
56
.
23.
Boschee
,
F.
, and
Baron
,
M.
, 1993,
Outcome-based Education: Developing Programs Through Strategic Planning
,
Technomic Publishing Co.
, Lancaster, PA.
24.
Moore
,
S.
, 1995, “
Efficiency in Social Work Practice and Administration
,”
Soc. Work
0037-8046,
40
, pp.
602
.
26.
Farris
,
J. A.
,
Groesbeck
,
R. L.
,
Aken
,
E. M. V.
, and
Letens
,
G.
, 2006, “
Evaluating the Relative Performance of Engineering Design Projects: A Case Study Using Data Envelopment Analysis
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
0018-9391,
53
, pp.
471
482
.
You do not currently have access to this content.