Understanding user needs and preferences is increasingly recognized as a critical component of early stage product development. The large-scale needfinding methods in this series of studies attempt to overcome shortcomings with existing methods, particularly in environments with limited user access. The three studies evaluated three specific types of stimuli to help users describe higher quantities of needs. Users were trained on need statements and then asked to enter as many need statements and optional background stories as possible. One or more stimulus types were presented, including prompts (a type of thought exercise), shared needs, and shared context images. Topics used were general household areas including cooking, cleaning, and trip planning. The results show that users can articulate a large number of needs unaided, and users consistently increased need quantity after viewing a stimulus. A final study collected 1735 needs statements and 1246 stories from 402 individuals in 24 hr. Shared needs and images significantly increased need quantity over other types. User experience (and not expertise) was a significant factor for increasing quantity, but may not warrant exclusive use of high-experience users in practice.

References

1.
Patnaik
,
D.
, and
Becker
,
R.
,
1999
, “
Needfinding: The Why and How of Uncovering People's Needs
,”
Des. Manage. J.
,
10
(
2
), pp.
37
43
.10.1111/j.1948-7169.1999.tb00250.x
2.
Zenios
,
S. A.
,
Makower
,
J.
,
Yock
,
P. G.
,
Brinton
,
T. J.
,
Kumar
,
U. N.
,
Denend
,
L.
, and
Krummel
,
T. M.
,
2010
,
Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies
,
Cambridge
University,
New York.
10.1017/CBO9780511757853
3.
Getzels
,
J. W.
,
1979
, “
Problem Finding: A Theoretical Note
,”
Cognit. Sci.
,
3
(
2
), pp.
167
172
.10.1207/s15516709cog0302_4
4.
Beckman
,
S. L.
, and
Barry
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking
,”
Calif. Manage. Rev.
,
50
(
1
), pp.
25
56
.10.2307/41166415
5.
Martin
,
J.
,
Murphy
,
E.
,
Crowe
,
J.
, and
Norris
,
B.
,
2006
, “
Capturing User Requirements in Medical Device Development: The Role of Ergonomics
,”
Physiol. Meas.
,
27
(
8
), pp.
R49
R62
.10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/R01
6.
Cooper
,
R.
, and
Edgett
,
S.
,
2008
, “
Ideation for Product Innovation: What Are the Best Methods?
,”
PDMA Visions Mag.
,
1
, pp.
12
17
.
7.
Ulrich
,
K. T.
,
Eppinger
,
S. D.
, and
Goyal
,
A.
,
2011
,
Product Design and Development
, Vol.
2
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
8.
Kelley
,
T.
, and
Littman
,
J.
,
2001
,
The Art of Innovation
,
Crown Business
, New York.
9.
Gundlin
,
E.
,
2000
,
The 3M Way to Innovation
, 1st ed.,
Kodansha Intl.
, Tokyo.
10.
Alkaya
,
M.
,
Visser
,
F. S.
, and
De Lille
,
C.
,
2012
, “
Supporting NPD Teams in Innovation: Structuring User Data on the Foundations of Empathy
,”
Leading Innovation Through Design: Proceedings of the Design Management Institute 2012 International Research Conference
, Design Management Institute, pp.
1
8
.
11.
Kouprie
,
M.
, and
Visser
,
F. S.
,
2009
, “
A Framework for Empathy in Design: Stepping Into and Out of the User's Life
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
20
(
5
), pp.
437
448
.10.1080/09544820902875033
12.
Johnson
,
D. G.
,
Genco
,
N.
,
Saunders
,
M. N.
,
Williams
,
P.
,
Seepersad
,
C. C.
, and
Hölttä-Otto
,
K.
,
2014
, “
An Experimental Investigation of the Effectiveness of Empathic Experience Design for Innovative Concept Generation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
5
), p.
051009
.10.1115/1.4026951
13.
Elliott
,
R.
, and
Jankel-Elliott
,
N.
,
2003
, “
Using Ethnography in Strategic Consumer Research
,”
Qual. Mark. Res.
,
6
(
4
), pp.
215
223
.10.1108/13522750310495300
14.
Savenye
,
W.
, and
Robinson
,
R.
,
1996
, “
Qualitative Research Issues and Methods: An Introduction for Educational Technologists
,”
Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology
,
Macmillan Library Reference
,
New York
, pp.
1171
1195
.
15.
Weiss
,
R.
,
1995
,
Learning From Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies, 1st ed., Free Press
, New York.
16.
Rubin
,
H. J.
, and
Rubin
,
I. S.
,
2011
,
Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data
,
SAGE Publications
, Thousand Oaks.
17.
Griffin
,
A.
, and
Hauser
,
J. R.
,
1993
, “
The Voice of the Customer
,”
Mark. Sci.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
1
27
.10.1287/mksc.12.1.1
18.
Bayus
,
B. L.
,
2008
, “
Understanding Customer Needs
,”
The Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management
,
S.
Shane
, ed.,
Wiley
, West Sussex, UK, pp.
115
141
.
19.
Goldenberg
,
J.
,
Lehmann
,
D. R.
, and
Mazursky
,
D.
,
2001
, “
The Idea Itself and the Circumstances of Its Emergence as Predictors of New Product Success
,”
Manage. Sci.
,
47
(
1
), pp.
69
84
.10.1287/mnsc.47.1.69.10670
20.
Balachandra
,
R.
, and
Friar
,
J. H.
,
1997
, “
Factors for Success in R&D Projects and New Product Innovation: A Contextual Framework
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
,
44
(
3
), pp.
276
287
.10.1109/17.618169
21.
Holbrook
,
M. B.
, and
Hirschman
,
E. C.
,
1982
, “
The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun
,”
J. Consum. Res.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
132
140
.10.1086/208906
22.
Babin
,
B. J.
,
Darden
,
W. R.
, and
Griffin
,
M.
,
1994
, “
Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
,”
J. Consum. Res.
,
20
(
4
), pp.
644
656
.10.1086/209376
23.
Desmet
,
P. M.
, and
Hekkert
,
P.
,
2007
, “
Framework of Product Experience
,”
Int. J. Des.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
57
66
.
24.
Kudrowitz
,
B. M.
, and
Wallace
,
D.
,
2013
, “
Assessing the Quality of Ideas From Prolific, Early-Stage Product Ideation
,”
J. Eng. Des.
,
24
(
2
), pp.
120
139
.10.1080/09544828.2012.676633
25.
Dean
,
D. L.
,
Hender
,
J. M.
,
Rodgers
,
T. L.
, and
Santanen
,
E. L.
,
2006
, “
Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation
,”
J. Assoc. Inf. Syst.
,
7
(
10
), pp.
646
698
.
26.
Osborn
,
A. F.
,
1953
,
Applied Imagination
,
Scribner's
,
New York
.
27.
Nunamaker
,
J. F.
, Jr.
,
Briggs
,
R. O.
,
Mittleman
,
D. D.
,
Vogel
,
D. R.
, and
Balthazard
,
P. A.
,
1996
, “
Lessons From a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings
,”
J. Manage. Inf. Syst.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
163
207
.
28.
Martins
,
L. L.
,
Gilson
,
L. L.
, and
Maynard
,
M. T.
,
2004
, “
Virtual Teams: What do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?
,”
J. Manage.
,
30
(
6
), pp.
805
835
.
29.
VanGundy
,
A. B.
,
1984
, “
Brain Writing for New Product Ideas: An Alternative to Brainstorming
,”
J. Consum. Mark.
,
1
(
2
), pp.
67
74
.10.1108/eb008097
30.
Gallupe
,
R. B.
,
Dennis
,
A. R.
,
Cooper
,
W. H.
,
Valacich
,
J. S.
,
Bastianutti
,
L. M.
, and
Nunamaker
,
J. F.
,
1992
, “
Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size
,”
Acad. Manage. J.
,
35
(
2
), pp.
350
369
.10.2307/256377
31.
Pinsonneault
,
A.
,
Barki
,
H.
,
Gallupe
,
R. B.
, and
Hoppen
,
N.
,
1999
, “
Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity
,”
Inf. Syst. Res.
,
10
(
2
), pp.
110
133
.10.1287/isre.10.2.110
32.
DeRosa
,
D. M.
,
Smith
,
C. L.
, and
Hantula
,
D. A.
,
2007
, “
The Medium Matters: Mining the Long-Promised Merit of Group Interaction in Creative Idea Generation Tasks in a Meta-Analysis of the Electronic Group Brainstorming Literature
,”
Comput. Hum. Behav.
,
23
(
3
), pp.
1549
1581
.10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.003
33.
Paulus
,
P. B.
,
Kohn
,
N. W.
, and
Arditti
,
L. E.
,
2011
, “
Effects of Quantity and Quality Instructions on Brainstorming
,”
J. Creat. Behav.
,
45
(
1
), pp.
38
46
.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01083.x
34.
Diehl
,
M.
, and
Stroebe
,
W.
,
1987
, “
Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle
,”
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
,
53
(
3
), pp.
497
509
.10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
35.
Dugosh
,
K. L.
, and
Paulus
,
P. B.
,
2005
, “
Cognitive and Social Comparison Processes in Brainstorming
,”
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
,
41
(
3
), pp.
313
320
.10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.009
36.
Morgan
,
J.
, and
Wang
,
R.
,
2010
, “
Tournaments for Ideas
,”
Calif. Manage. Rev.
,
52
(
2
), pp.
77
97
.10.1525/cmr.2010.52.2.77
37.
Jansson
,
D. G.
, and
Smith
,
S. M.
,
1991
, “
Design Fixation
,”
Des. Stud.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
3
11
.10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
38.
Linsey
,
J.
,
Tseng
,
I.
,
Fu
,
K.
,
Cagan
,
J.
,
Wood
,
K.
, and
Schunn
,
C.
,
2010
, “
A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041003
.10.1115/1.4001110
39.
Viswanathan
,
V. K.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2013
, “
Design Fixation and Its Mitigation: A Study on the Role of Expertise
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
135
(
5
), p.
051008
.10.1115/1.4024123
40.
IDEO
,
2003
, Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design, Palo Alto, CA.
41.
Lin
,
J.
, and
Seepersad
,
C. C.
,
2007
, “
Empathic Lead Users: The Effects of Extraordinary User Experiences on Customer Needs Analysis and Product Redesign
,”
ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp.
289
296
.
42.
Chesbrough
,
H. W.
,
2006
, “
The Era of Open Innovation
,”
Managing Innovation Change
,
127
(
3
), pp.
34
41
.
43.
Dow
,
S.
,
Gerber
,
E.
, and
Wong
,
A.
,
2013
, “
A Pilot Study of Using Crowds in the Classroom
,”
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
,
CHI’13
, ACM, pp.
227
236
.10.1145/2470654.2470686
44.
Stone
,
T.
, and
Choi
,
S.-K.
,
2013
, “
Extracting Consumer Preference From User-Generated Content Sources Using Classification
,”
ASME
Paper No. DETC2013-13228.10.1115/DETC2013-13228
45.
Faste
,
H.
,
2011
, “
Opening ‘Open’ Innovation
,”
Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
, DPPI’11, ACM, pp.
54:1
54:8
.
46.
Nijstad
,
B. A.
,
Stroebe
,
W.
, and
Lodewijkx
,
H. F.
,
2002
, “
Cognitive Stimulation and Interference in Groups: Exposure Effects in an Idea Generation Task
,”
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
,
38
(
6
), pp.
535
544
.10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00500-0
47.
Dugosh
,
K. L.
,
Paulus
,
P. B.
,
Roland
,
E. J.
, and
Yang
,
H.-C.
,
2000
, “
Cognitive Stimulation in Brainstorming
,”
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
,
79
(
5
), pp.
722
–735.10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722
48.
Kohn
,
N. W.
,
Paulus
,
P. B.
, and
Choi
,
Y.
,
2011
, “
Building on the Ideas of Others: An Examination of the Idea Combination Process
,”
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
,
47
(
3
), pp.
554
561
.10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004
49.
Dennis
,
A. R.
,
Minas
,
R. K.
, and
Bhagwatwar
,
A. P.
,
2013
, “
Sparking Creativity: Improving Electronic Brainstorming With Individual Cognitive Priming
,”
J. Manage. Inf. Syst.
,
29
(
4
), pp.
195
216
.10.2753/MIS0742-1222290407
50.
Rosenthal
,
S.
, and
Capper
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Ethnographies in the Front End: Designing for Enhanced Customer Experiences
,”
J. Prod. Innovation Manage.
,
23
(
3
), pp.
215
237
.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00195.x
51.
Toh
,
C. A.
, and
Miller
,
S. R.
,
2014
, “
The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
136
(
9
), p.
091004
.10.1115/1.4027639
52.
Martin
,
J.
, and
Barnett
,
J.
,
2012
, “
Integrating the Results of User Research Into Medical Device Development: Insights From a Case Study
,”
BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making
,
12
(
74
), pp.
1
10
.10.1186/1472-6947-12-74
53.
Kramer
,
D. B.
,
Xu
,
S.
, and
Kesselheim
,
A. S.
,
2012
, “
How Does Medical Device Regulation Perform in the United States and the European Union? A Systematic Review
,”
PLoS Med.
,
9
(
7
), p.
1001276
.10.1371/journal.pmed.1001276
54.
Money
,
A.
,
Barnett
,
J.
,
Kuljis
,
J.
,
Craven
,
M.
,
Martin
,
J.
, and
Young
,
T.
,
2011
, “
The Role of the User Within the Medical Device Design and Development Process: Medical Device Manufacturers' Perspectives
,”
BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making
,
11
(
15
), pp.
1
12
.10.1186/1472-6947-11-15
55.
Shah
,
A.
, and
Alshawi
,
S.
,
2010
, “
The Role of User Requirements Research in Medical Device Development
,”
European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems
, Abu Dhabi, UAE, EMCIS2010, pp.
1
25
.
56.
Poulton
,
B.
,
1999
, “
User Involvement in Identifying Health Needs and Shaping and Evaluating Services: Is it Being Realised?
,”
J. Adv. Nurs.
,
30
(
6
), pp.
1289
1296
.10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01224.x
57.
Ram
,
M.
,
Campling
,
N.
,
Grocott
,
P.
, and
Weir
,
H.
,
2008
, “
A Methodology for a Structured Survey of the Healthcare Literature Related to Medical Device Users
,”
Evaluation
,
14
(
1
), pp.
49
73
.10.1177/1356389007084676
58.
Vredenburg
,
K.
,
Mao
,
J.
,
Smith
,
P.
, and
Carey
,
T.
,
2002
, “
A Survey of User-Centered Design Practice
,” Proceedings of the
SIGCHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing Our World
, Changing Ourselves, ACM, pp.
471
478
.10.1145/503457.503460
59.
Aquino Shluzas
,
L.
,
Steinert
,
M.
, and
Leifer
,
L. J.
,
2011
, “
Designing to Maximize Value for Multiple Stakeholders: A Challenge to Med-Tech Innovation
,”
18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design
, Vol.
10
: Design Methods and Tools pt. 2, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Aug. 15–19, pp.
159
166
.
60.
Shah
,
S.
, and
Robinson
,
I.
,
2007
, “
Benefits of and Barriers to Involving Users in Medical Device Technology Development and Evaluation
,”
Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care
,
23
(
1
), pp.
131
137
.10.1017/S0266462307051677
61.
Kauppinen
,
M.
,
Kujala
,
S.
,
Aaltio
,
T.
, and
Lehtola
,
L.
,
2002
, “
Introducing Requirements Engineering: How to Make a Cultural Change Happen in Practice
,”
IEEE
Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering
, pp.
43
51
.10.1109/ICRE.2002.1048504
62.
Paolacci
,
G.
,
Chandler
,
J.
, and
Ipeirotis
,
P.
,
2010
, “
Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
,”
Judgment Decis. Making
,
5
(
5
), pp.
411
419
.
63.
Bretz
,
F.
,
Hothorn
,
T.
, and
Westfall
,
P.
,
2010
,
Multiple Comparisons Using R
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
.10.1201/9781420010909
64.
Mason
,
W.
, and
Watts
,
D. J.
,
2010
, “
Financial Incentives and the Performance of Crowds
,”
ACM SigKDD Explor. Newslett.
,
11
(
2
), pp.
100
108
.10.1145/1809400.1809422
65.
Nov
,
O.
,
Anderson
,
D.
, and
Arazy
,
O.
,
2010
, “
Volunteer Computing: A Model of the Factors Determining Contribution to Community-Based Scientific Research
,”
Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web
, ACM, pp.
741
750
.10.1145/1772690.1772766
66.
Curran
,
V. R.
, and
Fleet
,
L.
,
2005
, “
A Review of Evaluation Outcomes of Web-Based Continuing Medical Education
,”
Med. Educ.
,
39
(
6
), pp.
561
567
.10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02173.x
You do not currently have access to this content.