Stroke is one of the leading causes of adult physical disability, and rehabilitation and hospitalization costs for stroke are among the highest for all injuries. Current rehabilitation techniques are labor intensive and time consuming for therapists and difficult to perform effectively. Research suggests that starting rehabilitation during the acute or subacute stage of recovery results in better outcomes than therapy delivered in the chronic stage. To improve the gait rehabilitation process, robot-assisted gait rehabilitation has gained much interest over the past years. However, many robot-assisted rehabilitation devices have limitations; one of which is being bulky and complex to handle. Large and expensive devices that require special training to operate are less attractive to clinics and therapists, and ultimately less likely to be available to patients especially at the early stage of stroke. To address these limitations, this research proposes a new gait rehabilitation device called the linkage design gait trainer (LGT). The device is based on a walking frame design with a simple four-bar linkage “end-effector” mechanism to generate normal gait trajectories during general walking and exercise. The design of the four-bar linkage mechanism was optimized for a particular gait pattern. A prototype of the device was developed and tested. The kinematics of the device itself and gait kinematics with and without assistance from the device were recorded and analyzed using an optical motion capture system. The results show the linkage mechanism is able to guide the leg of the user during over ground walking. There were some differences in the hip (20.5 deg RMS) and knee (14.8 deg RMS) trajectory between the person walking with and without the device assistance. The study demonstrated the concept and feasibility of this novel gait training device.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2017
Technical Briefs
Design, Analysis, and Optimization of an Acute Stroke Gait Rehabilitation Device
Kazuto Kora,
Kazuto Kora
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: kkor008@aucklanduni.ac.nz
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: kkor008@aucklanduni.ac.nz
Search for other works by this author on:
James Stinear,
James Stinear
Department of Exercise Sciences,
Faculty of Science,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: j.stinear@auckland.ac.nz
Faculty of Science,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: j.stinear@auckland.ac.nz
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew McDaid
Andrew McDaid
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: andrew.mcdaid@auckland.ac.nz
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: andrew.mcdaid@auckland.ac.nz
Search for other works by this author on:
Kazuto Kora
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: kkor008@aucklanduni.ac.nz
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: kkor008@aucklanduni.ac.nz
James Stinear
Department of Exercise Sciences,
Faculty of Science,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: j.stinear@auckland.ac.nz
Faculty of Science,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: j.stinear@auckland.ac.nz
Andrew McDaid
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: andrew.mcdaid@auckland.ac.nz
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Auckland,
Private Bag 92019,
Auckland Mail Centre,
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
e-mail: andrew.mcdaid@auckland.ac.nz
Manuscript received April 28, 2016; final manuscript received October 16, 2016; published online December 21, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Rita M. Patterson.
J. Med. Devices. Mar 2017, 11(1): 014503 (6 pages)
Published Online: December 21, 2016
Article history
Received:
April 28, 2016
Revised:
October 16, 2016
Citation
Kora, K., Stinear, J., and McDaid, A. (December 21, 2016). "Design, Analysis, and Optimization of an Acute Stroke Gait Rehabilitation Device." ASME. J. Med. Devices. March 2017; 11(1): 014503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035127
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Flow Diverter Technology for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Review
J. Med. Devices (June 2025)
Editorial
J. Med. Devices (March 2025)
An MR-Safe Pneumatic Stepper Motor: Design, Control, and Characterization
J. Med. Devices (March 2025)
Related Articles
Automated Real-Time Processing of Single Lead Electrocardiogram for Simultaneous Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate Monitoring
J. Med. Devices (June,2017)
An Adjustable Single Degree-of-Freedom System to Guide Natural Walking Movement for Rehabilitation
J. Med. Devices (December,2016)
Introduction
J. Med. Devices (September,2014)
Introduction
J. Med. Devices (September,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
QRAS Approach to Phased Mission Analysis (PSAM-0444)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Optimization Method for Trajectory Correction Accuracy of Target Measurement Based on Monte — Carlo
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Trajectory Optimization of Hypersonic Vehicle Using Gauss and Legendre Pseudospectral Method
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3