Quasi-static and impact tests were conducted on filament-wound carbon fiber composite pressure vessels to study factors that affect burst pressure. Observed damage included fiber microbuckling, matrix cracking, and delamination. Fiber microbuckling of the outer surface layer near the impact point was the main factor that reduced the burst pressure of the vessels. This type of damage was visually detectable on the surface. For similar levels of missile kinetic energy, the impact damage to filament-wound composite pressure vessels depends on size and shape of the colliding body in the contact area. Burst pressure for a damaged vessel decreases with the ratio of axial length of damaged fibers 1, to vessel wall thickness h, up to a ratio 1/h = 3; beyond this length of damaged section the burst pressure was independent of length of damage. Strain measurements near the region of loading showed that damage related to fiber microbuckling is sensitive to strain rate. At locations where impact damage was predominately due to fiber microbuckling, the failure strain was about six times the strain for microbuckling during quasi-static loading.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Carbon reinforced plastics, Composite materials, Damage, Pressure vessels, Fibers, Pressure, Vessels, Carbon fibers, Cracking (Materials), Delamination, Failure, Fracture (Process), Impact testing, Kinetic energy, Missiles, Shapes, Strain measurement, Wall thickness
1.
Alderson
K. L.
, and
Evans
K. E.
,
1992
, “
Failure Mechanisms During the Transverse Loading of Filament-Wound Pipes Under Static and Low Velocity Impact Conditions
,”
Composites
, Vol.
23
(
3
), pp.
167
–
173
.
2.
Alderson
K. L.
, and
Evans
K. E.
,
1992
a, “
Low Velocity Transverse Impact of Filament-Wound Pipes: Part 1. Damage Due to Static and Impact Loads
,”
Composite Structures
, Vol.
20
, pp.
37
–
45
.
3.
Alderson
K. L.
, and
Evans
K. E.
,
1992
b, “
Low Velocity Transverse Impact of Filament-Wound Pipes: Part 2. Residual Properties and Correlations with Impact Damage
,”
Composite Structures
, Vol.
20
, pp.
47
–
52
.
4.
Budiansky
B.
, and
Fleck
N. A.
,
1993
, “
Compressive Failure of Fibre Composites
,”
Journal of Mechanics Physics and of Solids
, Vol.
41
(
1
), pp.
183
–
211
.
5.
Christoforou, A. P., Swanson, S. R., Ventrello, S. C., and Beckwith, S. W., 1987, “Impact Damage In Carbon/Epoxy Composite Cylinders,” 32nd Annual SAMPE Symposium, Sampe Publishing, Corvina USA, pp. 964–973.
6.
Christoforou
A. P.
, and
Swanson
S. R.
,
1988
, “
Strength Loss in Composite Cylinders Under Impact
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
, Vol.
110
, pp.
180
–
184
.
7.
Christoforou
A. P.
, and
Swanson
S. R.
,
1990
, “
Analysis of Simply Supported Orthotropic Cylindrical shells Subjected to Lateral Impact Loads
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
57
, pp.
376
–
382
.
8.
Clark
G.
,
1989
, “
Modelling Of Impact Damage in Composite Laminates
,”
Composites
, Vol.
20
(
3
), pp.
209
–
214
.
9.
Hahn, H. T., and Williams, J. G., 1986, “Compression Failure Mechanisms in Unidirectional Composites,” Composite Materials: Testing and Design, Seventh Conference, ASTM STP 893, J. M. Whitney, ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 115–139.
10.
Lloyd, B. A., and Knight, G. K., 1986, “Impact Damage Sensitivity of Filament-Wound Composite Pressure Vessel,” JANNAF Meeting, New Orleans, LA, pp. 7–15.
11.
Matemilola
S. A.
, and
Stronge
W. J.
,
1997
, “
Impact Response of Composite Cylinders
,”
International Journal of Solids and Structures
, Vol.
74
, (
21
), pp.
2669
–
2684
.
12.
Timoshenko, S., and Woinowsky-Krieger, S., 1970, Theory of Plates and Shells, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, pp. 4–20.
13.
Weaver
C. W.
, and
Williams
J. G.
,
1975
, “
Deformation of a Carbon-Epoxy Composite Under Hydrostatic Pressure
,”
Journal of Materials Science
, Vol.
10
, pp.
1323
–
1333
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.