Abstract

When a water piping system operating under high temperatures and pressures is damaged and water is expelled into the atmosphere, a phenomenon known as depressurization boiling or flashing occurs. This flashing jet poses a risk to human safety and can damage safety equipment through impingement. Consequently, evaluating the region affected by the flashing jet impinging on the surrounding equipment and people is necessary. In this study, we conducted experiments to verify the affected region of the jet involving both saturated and subcooled water under low-pressure conditions at the jet inlet, up to 2 MPaA, and extended our investigation to high-pressure conditions up to 7 MPaA using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The findings revealed that the mass flux predictions, according to the homogeneous equilibrium model (HEM) outlined in the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard, align with both experimental and CFD analysis results. However, the evaluations of both the asymptotic plane width and distance—parameters delineating the jet's affected region—were found to be underestimated in the ANSI standard compared with the experimental and CFD analysis results. To address this difference from real phenomena, we developed an improved model that incorporates mass flux and enthalpy as variables. This improved model more accurately predict the asymptotic plane width and distance than the ANSI standard. Utilizing this improved model enables precise prediction of the flashing jet's affected region, spanning conditions from saturated to subcooled water across various pipe diameters.

References

1.
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering
,
2003
, “
Rules on Protection Design Against Postulated Pipe Rupture for Nuclear Power Plants
,” JSME S ND1-2002.
2.
American National Standards Institute
,
1988
, “
Design Basis For Protection Of Light Water Nuclear Power Plants Against The Effects of Postulated Pipe Rupture
,” ANSI, Washington, DC, Report No. ANSI/ANS-58.2-1988.
3.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
1995
, “
Parametric Study of the Potential for BWR ECCS Strainer Blockage Due to LOCA Generated Debris
,” USNRC, Rockville, MD, Report No. SEANo.93-554-06-A:1, NUREG/CR-6224.
4.
Moody
,
F. J.
,
1969
, “
Prediction of Blowdown Thrust and Jet Forces
,”
ASME
Paper No. 69-HT-31.10.1115/69-HT-31
5.
Electric Power Research Institute
,
1986
, “
Two-Phase Jet Modeling and Data Comparison
,” EPRI, Washington, DC, Report No. Epri NP-4362.
6.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
2015
, “
Determination of Rupture Locations and Dynamic Effects Associated With the Postulated Rupture of Piping
,” Standard Review Plan, Section 3.6.2, NUREG-0800.
7.
Kong
,
R.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Ishii
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Review of Jet Impingement in High-Energy Piping Systems
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
357
, p.
110411
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110411
8.
Yano
,
T.
,
Isozaki
,
T.
,
Ueda
,
S.
,
Miyazaki
,
N.
,
Kurihara
,
R.
,
Kato
,
R.
, and
Miyazono
,
S.
,
1984
, “
An Experimental Study of Blowdown Thrust and Jet Forces for a Pipe Under Boiling Water Reactor Loss-of-Coolant Accident Conditions
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
88
(
3
), pp.
386
395
.10.13182/NSE84-A18592
9.
Kawanishi
,
K.
,
Isono
,
M.
,
Masuda
,
F.
, and
Nakatogawa
,
T.
,
1986
, “
Experimental Study on Jets Formed Under Discharges of High-Pressure Subcooled Water and Steam-Water Mixtures From Short Nozzles
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
95
, pp.
243
251
.10.1016/0029-5493(86)90051-8
10.
Henry
,
R. E.
, and
Fauske
,
H. K.
,
1971
, “
The Two-Phase Critical Flow of One-Component Mixtures in Nozzles, Orifices, and Short Tubes
,”
ASME J. Heat Mass Transfer-Trans. ASME
,
93
(
2
), pp.
179
187
.10.1115/1.3449782
11.
Morita
,
R.
,
Uchiyama
,
Y.
,
Watanabe
,
S.
,
Takahashi
,
S.
,
Xu
,
Q.
, and
Takamura
,
N.
,
2016
, “
Evaluation of Jet Impact Region and Fluid Force Generated From Ruptured Pipes (1) Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Affected Region by Steam Jet
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE24-60341
.10.1115/ICONE24-60341
12.
Takahashi
,
S.
,
Xu
,
Q.
,
Takamura
,
N.
,
Morita
,
R.
,
Uchiyama
,
Y.
, and
Watanabe
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Evaluation of Jet Impact Region and Fluid Force Generated From Ruptured Pipes (2) Evaluation of Fluid Force Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE24-60316
.10.1115/ICONE24-60316
13.
Xu
,
Q.
,
Takahashi
,
S.
,
Takamura
,
N.
,
Morita
,
R.
,
Uchiyama
,
Y.
, and
Watanabe
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Evaluation of Jet Impact Region and Fluid Force Generated From Ruptured Pipes (3) Evaluation of Established Standards
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE24-60317
.10.1115/ICONE24-60317
14.
Yuasa
,
T.
,
Morita
,
R.
,
Watanabe
,
S.
, and
Takahashi
,
S.
,
2022
, “
Evaluation of Affected Region by Steam Jet on Surrounding Environment
,”
Trans. JSME
,
88
(
913
), pp.
22
00157
.10.1299/transjsme.22-00157
15.
Morita
,
R.
,
Watanabe
,
S.
,
Takahashi
,
S.
, and
Takamura
,
N.
,
2018
, “
Evaluation of Jet Impact Region and Fluid Force Generated From Ruptured Pipes: Part 4 — Numerical Evaluation of Affected Region by Flashing Jet Flow
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE26-82063
.10.1115/ICONE26-82063
16.
Kong
,
R.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Ishii
,
M.
,
2021
, “
Jet Impingement in High Energy Piping Systems, Part I: Characteristics and Model Evaluation
,”
Prog. Nucl. Energy
,
142
, p.
104002
.10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104002
17.
Kong
,
R.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Ishii
,
M.
,
2021
, “
Jet Impingement in High-Energy Piping Systems, Part II: Model Improvement and Guidance Development
,”
Prog. Nucl. Energy
,
142
, p.
104001
.10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104001
18.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
2021
, “
Jet Impingement in High-Energy Piping Systems
,” USNRC, Rockville, MD, Report No. NUREG/CR-7275.
19.
CRAFT Tech
, 2024, “
CRUNCH CFD
,” Combustion Research and Flow Technology, Inc., Pipersville, PA, accessed Mar. 29, 2024, https://crunch.craft-tech.com/
20.
Yuasa
,
T.
,
Watanabe
,
S.
, and
Morita
,
R.
,
2022
, “
Evaluation of Flashing Jet Impact on Surroundings Due to Leakage of High Pressure Pipes
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2022-80253.10.1115/PVP2022-80253
21.
Hall
,
D. G.
, and
Czapary
,
L. S.
,
1980
, “
Tables of Homogeneous Equilibrium Critical Flow Parameters for Water in SI Units
,” EG&G, Idaho Falls, ID, Report No. EGG-2056.
You do not currently have access to this content.