A realistic description of rough surfaces will generally involve very large arrays of surface height data, which makes the application of conventional numerical methods of contact mechanics to rough contact analyses impractical. Recently, two fast numerical techniques have been applied to rough contact problems: the multi-level multi-summation (MLMS) and the fast Fourier transform (FFT). In this work, the computational efficiency of the two methods is compared by applying them to an example concentrated contact problem. It is shown that to achieve a numerical accuracy comparable to that of MLMS, the grid on which FFT is performed needs to be extended far beyond the contact area, which results in a dramatic increase in the computation time. When such a high accuracy is unnecessary. FFT can be applied on a smaller grid. However, the computational speed of MLMS can also be increased in this case by modifying certain algorithm parameters. Numerical results demonstrate that MLMS is more advantageous than FFT for solving three-dimensional concentrated contact problems, both when the maximum possible accuracy is desired and when a moderate accuracy goal is specified. [S0742-4787(00)00601-9]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2000
Technical Papers
Fast Methods for Solving Rough Contact Problems: A Comparative Study
I. A. Polonsky,
I. A. Polonsky
Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3109
Search for other works by this author on:
L. M. Keer, Fellow ASME
L. M. Keer, Fellow ASME
Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3109
Search for other works by this author on:
I. A. Polonsky
Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3109
L. M. Keer, Fellow ASME
Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-3109
Contributed by the Tribology Division of THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS and presented at the STLE/ASME Tribology Conference, Orlando, FL, October 10–13, 1999. Manuscript received by the Tribology Division October 9, 1998; revised manuscript received April 20, 1999. Paper No. 99-Trib-4. Associate Technical Editor: T. C. Ovaert.
J. Tribol. Jan 2000, 122(1): 36-41 (6 pages)
Published Online: April 20, 1999
Article history
Received:
October 9, 1998
Revised:
April 20, 1999
Citation
Polonsky , I. A., and Keer , L. M. (April 20, 1999). "Fast Methods for Solving Rough Contact Problems: A Comparative Study ." ASME. J. Tribol. January 2000; 122(1): 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.555326
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Factor Analysis-Based Selection of Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge Oil as a Promising Bio-Based Lubricant
J. Tribol (February 2025)
A Review on Mechanical and Wear Characteristics of Magnesium Metal Matrix Composites
J. Tribol (February 2025)
Related Articles
A Fast and Accurate Method for Numerical Analysis of Elastic Layered Contacts
J. Tribol (January,2000)
Studying Contact Stress Fields Caused by Surface Tractions With a Discrete Convolution and Fast Fourier Transform Algorithm
J. Tribol (January,2002)
Fast Fourier Transform Based Numerical Methods for Elasto-Plastic Contacts of Nominally Flat Surfaces
J. Appl. Mech (January,2008)
Surface Normal Thermoelastic Displacement in Moving Rough Contacts
J. Tribol (October,2003)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Getting Started
Technical Writing A–Z: A Commonsense Guide to Engineering Reports and Theses (U.S. Edition)
On the Evaluation of Thermal and Mechanical Factors in Low-Speed Sliding
Tribology of Mechanical Systems: A Guide to Present and Future Technologies
Global Mode Visualization in Cavitating Flows
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)