Squeeze film dampers (SFDs) reduce rotor vibrations and control dynamic instabilities in turbomachinery. Depending on damper geometry and operating conditions, the kinematics of journal motion can induce air ingestion and entrapment, produce lubricant vapor cavitation, or both. Air ingestion is the most common condition found in open ended dampers due to the low levels of external pressurization used in practice. The degrading effect of air entrapment on damper performance not only defies predictive models but also constrains the design of SFDs to a costly trial and error process based on prior experience. The present measurements correlate for the first time dynamic squeeze film pressures and pictures of the flow field with the air volume content in the lubricant mixture of a damper performing circular centered motion. The photographs of the flow field at key instances of journal motion show the development of a non-homogeneous flow with large striated cavities of air that persist even in the regions of positive (above ambient) dynamic pressures.

1.
San Andre´s
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1986
, “
Experimental Measurement of the Dynamic Pressure Distributions in a Squeeze-Film Bearing Damper Executing Circular-Centered Orbits
,”
ASLE Trans.
30
, No.
3
, pp.
373
383
.
2.
Arauz
,
G. L.
, and
San Andre´s
,
L.
,
1993
, “
Experimental Pressures and Film Forces in a Squeeze Film Damper
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
115
, pp.
134
140
.
3.
Jung
,
S. Y.
,
San Andre´s
,
L. A.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1991
, “
Measurements of Pressure Distributions and Force Coefficients in a Squeeze Film Damper: Part I—Fully Open Ended Configuration
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
34
, No.
3
, pp.
375
382
.
4.
Diaz
,
S.
, and
San Andre´s
,
L.
,
1999
, “
Reduction of the Dynamic Load Capacity in a Squeeze Film Damper Operating with a Bubbly Lubricant
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
, pp.
703
709
.
5.
Diaz, S., and San Andre´s, L., 1999, “Air Entrainment versus Lubricant Vaporization in Squeeze Film Dampers: An Experimental Assessment of Their Fundamental Differences,” ASME Paper 99-GT-187.
6.
Diaz
,
S.
, and
San Andre´s
,
L.
,
1998
, “
Measurements of Pressure in a Squeeze Film Damper With an Air/Oil Bubbly Mixture
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
41
, pp.
282
288
.
7.
Zeidan
,
F.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1990
, “
Cavitation Regimes in Squeeze Film Dampers and Their Effect on the Pressure Distribution
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
33
, pp.
447
453
.
8.
Diaz
,
S.
, and
San Andre´s
,
L.
,
1999
, “
A Method for Identification of Bearing Force Coefficients and its Application to a Squeeze Film Damper with a Bubbly Lubricant
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
42
, No.
4
, pp.
739
746
.
9.
Rodriguez, L., Diaz, S., and San Andre´s, L., 2001, “Sine Sweep Load Versus Impact Excitations and Their Influence on the Identification of Damping in a Bubbly Oil Squeeze Film Damper,” presented at the STLE Annual Meeting (Orlando, May), accepted for publication at Tribology Transactions (October 2001 issue).
10.
Diaz
,
S
. and
San Andre´s
L.
,
2000
, “
A Model for Squeeze Film Dampers Operating with Air Entrainment and Validation with Experiments
,”
ASME J. of Tribology
,
123
, No.
1
, pp.
125
133
.
You do not currently have access to this content.