In this paper the mixing of stator wakes in turbomachinery is considered. An extension is made to the existing model of Denton (1993, ASME J. Turbomach., 115, pp. 621–656) which addresses the effects of acceleration before mixing. Denton showed that if a total pressure wake was accelerated, mixing loss diminished, and vice versa. Here a total temperature wake is shown to exhibit a reverse trend. An attempt is also made to understand better the work transfer process between a stator wake and a rotor. The paper concentrates on axial turbines, but a brief look at compressors is included. It is argued that the free-stream work is not the same as the wake work, and the concept of “Differential Work” is introduced. A simple steady velocity triangle based model is proposed to give an estimate of the ratio of wake work to free-stream work (μ, see later). The model is compared to an unsteady CFD result to offer some verification of the assumptions. It is concluded that the rotodynamic work process tends to reduce total pressure wake depths in turbines and compressors and therefore mixing losses. The mixing loss due to total temperature wakes is less strongly affected by the differential work process. [S0889-504X(00)00801-1]

1.
Denton, J. D., and Cumpsty, N. A., 1987, “Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines,” I. Mech. E C260/87.
2.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1993
, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
3.
Carscallen
,
W. E.
,
Currie
,
T. C.
,
Hogg
,
S. I.
, and
Gostelow
,
J. P.
,
1999
, “
Measurement and Computation of Energy Separation in the Vortical Wake Flow of a Turbine Nozzle Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
121
, pp.
703
708
.
4.
Hartsel, J. E., 1972, “Prediction of Effects of Mass-Transfer Cooling on the Blade-Row Efficiency of Turbine Aerofoils,” AIAA 10th ASM, San Diego, Jan.
5.
Banieghbal, M. R., Curtis, E. M., Denton, J. D., Hodson, H. P., Huntsman, I., Schulte, V., Harvey, N. W., and Steele, A. B., 1995, “Wake Passing in LP Turbine Blades,” AGARD PEP 85th Symp., CP-571.
6.
Schro¨der, Th., 1991, “Investigations of Blade Row Interaction and Boundary Layer Transition Phenomena in a Multistage Aero Engine Low-Pressure Turbine by Measurements With Hot-Film Probes and Surface Mounted Hot-Film Gauges,” Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, LS 1991-06.
7.
Walraevens, R. E., and Gallus, H. E., 1995, “Stator–Rotor–Stator Interaction in an Axial Flow Turbine and Its Influence on Loss Mechanisms,” AGARD PEP 85th Symp., CP-571.
8.
Moss, R. W., Ainsworth, R. W., Sheldrake, C. D., and Miller, R., 1997, “The Unsteady Pressure Field Over a Turbine Blade Surface: Visualization and Interpretation of Experimental Data,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-474.
9.
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Dawes
,
W. N.
,
1998
, “
On the Interpretation of Measured Profile Losses in Unsteady Wake-Turbine Blade Interaction Studies
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
, pp.
276
284
.
10.
Kerrebrock
,
J. L.
, and
Mikolajczak
,
A. A.
,
1970
, “
Intra Stator Transport of Rotor Wakes and its Effect on Compressor Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
92
, pp.
359
368
.
11.
Van Zante, D. E., Adamczyk, J. J., Strasizar, A. J., and Okiishi, T. H., 1997, “Wake Recovery Performance Benefit in a High-Speed Axial Compressor,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-535.
12.
Valkov
,
T. V.
, and
Tan
,
C. S.
,
1999
, “
Effect of Upstream Rotor Vortical Disturbances on the Time-Averaged Performance of Axial Compressor Stators: Part 2—Rotor Tip Vortex/Streamwise Vortex-Stator Blade Interactions
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
121
, pp.
387
397
.
13.
Shapiro, A. H., 1953, The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Wiley, New York.
14.
Gwilliam, N. J., and Kingston, T. R., 1998, “Advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Design of Military Turbines,” R.T.O. Symposium “Design Principles and Methods for Gas Turbine Engines,” Toulouse, May, Paper No. 32.
15.
Lewis, K. L., 1993, “The Aerodynamics of Shrouded Multistage Turbines,” PhD. Thesis, Cambridge University, Nov.
16.
Denton, J. D., 1997, “UNSTREST Code,” private communication.
You do not currently have access to this content.