As CFD has matured to the point that it is capable of reliable and accurate flow simulation, attention is now firmly fixed on how best to deploy that CFD as part of a process to improve actual products. This “process” consists of capturing and controlling the geometry of a suitable portion of an aeroengine (e.g., a blade row, or an internal cooling system or a fan-plus-nacelle), building a mesh system, solving the flow and responding to an appropriately visualized flow field by changing or accepting the geometry. This paper looks at that process from the point of view of identifying any bottlenecks and argues that current research should be directed at the CAD-to-mesh-to-solution cycle time rather than, as has been traditional, just looking at the solver itself and in isolation. Work aimed at eliminating some of these bottlenecks is described, with a number of practical examples.

1.
Samareh
,
J. H.
,
1999
, “
Status & Future of Geometry Modelling and Grid Generation of Design and Optimisation
,”
J. Aircr.
,
36
, No. 1.
2.
Dawes, W. N., 1996, “The Generation of 3D Stretched, Viscous Unstructured Meshes for Arbitrary Domains” ASME Paper 96-GT-55.
3.
Dawes, W. N., Dhanasekaran, P. C., and Demargne, A. A. J., 1999, “NEWT_mesh mesh generation system” http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/∼mea/fluid/dawes/newt_mesh2/newt_mesh2.htm.
4.
Lo¨hner R., 1994, “CFD via Unstructured Grids: Trends & Applications” Frontiers of CFD, edited by Caughey, D. A., and Hafez, M. M. CMAS: Computational Methods in Applied Science.
5.
Fergusson, N., 1987, “Delaunay Edge Swapping in Three Dimensions,” Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Numerical & Computational Analysis, Dublin.
6.
Peraire
,
J.
,
Peiro
,
J.
,
Formaggia
,
J.
,
Morgan
,
K.
, and
Zienkiewicz
,
Q. C.
,
1988
, “
Finite Element Euler Computations in Three Dimensions
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
26
, pp.
2135
2159
.
7.
Jameson, A., Baker T. J., and Weatherhill, N. P., 1986, “Calculation of Inviscid Transonic Flow over a Complete Aircraft,” AIAA Paper 86-0103.
8.
Dawes, W. N., 1992, “The Practical Application of Solution Adaption to the Numerical Simulation of Complex Turbomachinery Problems,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 29, pp. 221–269.
9.
Dawes, W. N., 1993, “Simulating Unsteady Turbomachinery Flows on Unstructured Meshes which Adapt both in Time and Space,” ASME Paper 93-GT-104.
10.
Rycroft, N., Savill, A. M., and Dawes, W. N., 1999, “The Parallelisation of an Unstructured Mesh CFD Code, CUED Report, Cambridge University Engineering Department.
11.
Longley, J. P., and Demargne, A. A. J., 2000, “The Aerodynamic Interaction of Stator Shroud Leakage and Mainstream Flows in Compressors,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-570.
12.
Birkby, P., Cant, R. S., Dawes, W. N., Demargne, A. A. J., Dhanasekaran, P. C., Kellar, W. P., Rycroft, N. C., Savill, A. M., Eggels, R. L. G. M., and Jennions, I. K., 2000, “CFD Analysis of a Complete Industrial Lean Pre-mixed Gas Turbine Combustor,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-131.
13.
Kellar, W. P., Savill, A. M., and Dawes, W. N., 1999, “Integrated CAD/CFD Visualisation of a Generic F1 Car Front Wheel Flowfield,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1593.
14.
Kellar, W. P., “Geometry Modelling in CFD,” CUED/CFD Lab Report, 1999.
You do not currently have access to this content.