The paper presents mid-span measurements for a turbine cascade with active flow control. Steady blowing through an inclined plane wall jet has been used to control the separation characteristics of a high-lift low-pressure turbine airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. Measurements were made at design incidence for blowing ratios from approximately 0.25 to 2.0 (ratio of jet-to-local freestream velocity), for Reynolds numbers of 25,000 and 50,000 (based on axial chord and inlet velocity), and for freestream turbulence intensities of 0.4% and 4%. Detailed flow field measurements were made downstream of the cascade using a three-hole pressure probe, static pressure distributions were measured on the airfoil suction surface, and hot-wire measurements were made to characterize the interaction between the wall jet and boundary layer. The primary focus of the study is on the low-Reynolds number and low-freestream turbulence intensity cases, where the baseline airfoil stalls and high profile losses result. For low freestream turbulence (0.4%), the examined method of flow control was effective at preventing stall and reducing the profile losses. At a Reynolds number of 25,000, a blowing ratio greater than 1.0 was required to suppress stall. At a Reynolds number of 50,000, a closed separation bubble formed at a very low blowing ratio (0.25) resulting in a significant reduction in the profile loss. For high freestream turbulence intensity (4%), where the baseline airfoil has a closed separation bubble and low profile losses, blowing ratios below 1.0 resulted in a larger separation bubble and higher losses. The mechanism by which the wall jet affects the separation characteristics of the airfoil is examined through hot-wire traverse measurements in the vicinity of the slot.

1.
Hourmouziadis, J., 1989, “Aerodynamic Design of Low Pressure Turbines,” AGARD Lecture Series 167, pp. 1–40.
2.
Mayle
,
R. E.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Laminar–Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
537
.
3.
Hatman
,
A.
, and
Wang
,
T.
,
1999
, “
A Prediction Model for Separated-Flow Transition
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
121
, pp.
594
602
.
4.
Malkiel
,
E.
, and
Mayle
,
1996
, “
Transition in a Separation Bubble
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
752
759
.
5.
Yaras, M. I., 2001, “Measurements of the Effects of Pressure-Gradient History on Separation-Bubble Transition,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0193, New Orleans, Louisiana.
6.
Yaras, M. I., 2002, “Measurements of the Effects of Freestream Turbulence on Separation-Bubble Transition,” ASME Paper No. GT-2002-30232, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
7.
Mahallati, A., McAuliffe, B. R., Sjolander, S. A., and Praisner, T. J., 2004. “Aerodynamics of a Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil at Low-Reynolds Numbers, Part 1: Steady Flow Measurements,” AIAA Paper No. 2004-3931, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
8.
Murawski
,
C. G.
, and
Vafai
,
K.
,
2000
, “
An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Freestream Turbulence on the Wake of a Separated Low Pressure Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Numbers
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
122
, pp.
431
433
.
9.
Dorney, D. J., Lake, J. P., King, P. I., and Ashpis, D. E., 2000, “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Losses in Low-Pressure Turbine Blade Rows,” AIAA Paper No. 2000-0737, Reno, NV.
10.
Bons, J. P., Sondergaard, R., and Rivir, R. B., 1999, “Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Separation Using Vortex Generator Jets,” AIAA Paper No. 99-0367, Reno, Nevada.
11.
Bons
,
J. P.
,
Sondergaard
,
R.
, and
Rivir
,
R. B.
,
2001
, “
Turbine Separation Control Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
123
, pp.
198
206
.
12.
Gad-el-Hak, M., 2000, Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13.
Volino, R. J., 2003, “Passive Flow Control on Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoils,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38728, Atlanta, Georgia.
14.
Lake, J. P., King, P. I., and Rivir, R. B., 2000, “Low Reynolds Number Loss Reduction on Turbine Blades with Dimples and V-Grooves,” AIAA Paper No. 00–0738, Reno, NV.
15.
Fottner, L., 1979, “Theoretical and Experimental Investigations on Aerodynamically Highly-Loaded Compressor Bladings with Boundary Layer Control,” AIAA Paper No. 79-7032, Lake Buena Vista.
16.
Sturm
,
W.
,
Scheugenpflug
,
H.
, and
Fottner
,
L.
,
1992
, “
Performance Improvements of Compressor Cascades by Controlling the Profile and Sidewall Boundary Layers
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
477
486
.
17.
Culley, D. E., Bright, M. M., Prahst, P. S., and Strazisar, A. J., 2003, “Active Flow Separation Control of a Stator Vane Using Surface Injection in a Multistage Compressor Experiment,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38863, Atlanta, Georgia.
18.
Mahallati, A., 2003, “Aerodynamics of a Low-Pressure Turbine Airfoil Under Steady and Periodically Unsteady Conditions,” Ph.D. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
19.
Islam, A. M. T., and Sjolander, S. A., 1999, “Deviation in Axial Turbines at Subsonic Conditions,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-026, Indianapolis, IN.
You do not currently have access to this content.