This paper introduces a variant on the honeycomb-stator seal, which can extend the already strong stabilizing influence of this seal geometry for centrifugal compressors. The paper presents predicted and measured dynamic characteristics, demonstrating how a clearance, which diverges axially from inlet to outlet, increases the maximum effective damping of a honeycomb-stator seal, even though the average clearance is increased. The results also show a strong negative direct stiffness at zero and low frequency for this seal geometry (termed the “diverging taper honeycomb seal (DTHCS)”). The predictions are made with ISOTSEAL, software developed at The Texas A&M Turbomachinery Laboratory. (This code was developed within the Turbomachinery Laboratory and is not a commercial product (not for sale).) The test data, also obtained at the Turbomachinery Laboratory, confirm the nature and magnitude of both these dynamic characteristics with close fidelity. However, measured leakage falls significantly below predicted leakage. The frequency dependence of the seal dynamic characteristics and the strong negative static stiffness require careful attention in rotor dynamics analysis.

1.
Childs
,
D. W.
,
Jordan
,
L. T.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1997, “
Annular Gas Seals and Rotordynamics of Compressors and Turbines
,”
Proceedings 26th Turbomachinery Symposium
,
Houston, TX
, pp.
201
220
.
2.
Memmott
,
E. A.
, 1996, “
Stability of an Offshore Natural Gas Centrifugal Compressor
,”
15th Machinery Dynamics Seminar
, CMVA, Banff,
Alberta, Canada
.
3.
Memmott
,
E. A.
, 1994, “
Stability of a High Pressure Centrifugal Compressor Through Application of Shunt Holes and a Honeycomb Labyrinth
,”
13th Machinery Dynamics Seminar
, CMVA,
Toronto, Canada
.
4.
Memmott
,
E. A.
, 1998, “
Stability Analysis and Testing of a Train of Centrifugal Compressors for High Pressure Gas Injection
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-378.
5.
Miller
,
H. F.
, 2002, “
Centrifugal Pipeline Compressor Technology Evolution-High Pressure Pipeline Applications
,”
GMRC Gas Machinery Conference
,
Nashville, TN
.
6.
Vance
,
J. M.
, and
Schultz
,
R. R.
, 1993, “
A New Damper Seal for Turbomachinery
,”
ASME 14th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise
,
Albuquerque, NM
,
ASME
,
New York
, DE-Vol.
60
, pp.
139
148
.
7.
Vance
,
J. M.
, and
Li
,
J.
, 1996, “
Test Results of a New Damper Seal for Vibration Reduction in Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
118
, pp.
843
846
.
8.
Yu
,
Z.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
, 1998, “
A Comparison of Experimental Rotordynamic Coefficients and Leakage Characteristics Between Hole-Pattern Gas Damper Seals and a Honeycomb Seal
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
120
(
4
), pp.
778
783
.
9.
Kleynhans
,
G. F.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
, 1997, “
The Acoustic Influence of Cell Depth on the Rotordynamic Characteristics of Smooth-Rotor/Honeycomb-Stator Annular Gas Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
119
(
4
), pp.
949
957
.
10.
Camatti
,
M.
,
Vannini
,
G.
,
Fulton
,
J. W.
, and
Hopenwasser
,
F.
, 2003, “
Instability of a High Pressure Compressor Equipped With Honeycomb Seals
,”
Proceedings Thirty-Second Turbomachinery Symposium
, pp.
39
48
.
11.
Childs
,
D.
, and
Hale
,
K.
, 1994, “
A Test Apparatus and Facility to Identify the Rotordynamic Coefficients of High-Speed Hydrostatic Bearings
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
116
, pp.
337
344
.
12.
Lund
,
J. W.
, 1974, “
Stability and Damped Critical Speeds of a Flexible Rotor in Fluid-Film Bearings
,”
J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
96
, pp.
509
517
.
13.
Wachel
,
J. C.
, and
von Nimitz
,
W. W.
, 1980, “
Assuring the Reliability of Offshore Gas Compression Systems
,”
European Offshore Petroleum Conference and Exhibition
,
London, England
, EUR 205.
You do not currently have access to this content.