The aerodynamic behavior of turbine center frame (TCF) ducts under the presence of high-pressure turbine (HPT) purge flows was experimentally investigated in this two-part paper. While the first part of the paper demonstrated the impact of varying the purge flow rates (PFR) on the loss behavior of two different TCF designs, the second part concentrates on the influence of individual hub and tip purge flows on the main flow evolution and loss generation mechanisms through the TCF ducts. Therefore, measurements were conducted at six different operating conditions in a one and a half stage turbine test setup, featuring four individual purge flows injected through the hub and tip, forward and aft cavities of the HPT rotor. The outcomes of this first-time assessment indicate that a HPT purge flow reduction generally benefits TCF performance. Decreasing one of the rotor case PFRs leads to an improved duct pressure loss. The purge flows from the rotor aft hub and tip cavities are demonstrated to play a particularly important role for improving the duct aerodynamic behavior. In contrast, the forward rotor hub purge flow actually stabilizes the flow in the TCF duct and reducing this purge flow can penalize TCF performance. These particular HPT/TCF interactions should be taken into account whenever high-pressure turbine purge flow reductions are pursued.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 2018
Research-Article
Aerodynamic Performance of Turbine Center Frames With Purge Flows—Part II: The Influence of Individual Hub and Tip Purge Flows
Stefan Zerobin,
Stefan Zerobin
Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
e-mail: stefan.zerobin@tugraz.at
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
e-mail: stefan.zerobin@tugraz.at
Search for other works by this author on:
Christian Aldrian,
Christian Aldrian
Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
Andreas Peters,
Andreas Peters
GE Aviation,
Munich 85748, Germany
Munich 85748, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Franz Heitmeir,
Franz Heitmeir
Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
Search for other works by this author on:
Emil Göttlich
Emil Göttlich
Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria,
e-mail: emil.goettlich@tugraz.at
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria,
e-mail: emil.goettlich@tugraz.at
Search for other works by this author on:
Stefan Zerobin
Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
e-mail: stefan.zerobin@tugraz.at
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
e-mail: stefan.zerobin@tugraz.at
Christian Aldrian
Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
Andreas Peters
GE Aviation,
Munich 85748, Germany
Munich 85748, Germany
Franz Heitmeir
Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria
Emil Göttlich
Institute for Thermal Turbomachinery
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria,
e-mail: emil.goettlich@tugraz.at
and Machine Dynamics,
Graz University of Technology,
Graz 8010, Austria,
e-mail: emil.goettlich@tugraz.at
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received November 23, 2017; final manuscript received January 16, 2018; published online May 3, 2018. Editor: Kenneth Hall.
J. Turbomach. May 2018, 140(6): 061010 (8 pages)
Published Online: May 3, 2018
Article history
Received:
November 23, 2017
Revised:
January 16, 2018
Citation
Zerobin, S., Aldrian, C., Peters, A., Heitmeir, F., and Göttlich, E. (May 3, 2018). "Aerodynamic Performance of Turbine Center Frames With Purge Flows—Part II: The Influence of Individual Hub and Tip Purge Flows." ASME. J. Turbomach. May 2018; 140(6): 061010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039363
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Control of Tip Leakage in a High-Pressure Turbine Cascade Using Tip Blowing
J. Turbomach (June,2017)
Aerodynamic Performance of Turbine Center Frames With Purge Flows—Part I: The Influence of Turbine Purge Flow Rates
J. Turbomach (May,2018)
Experimental Investigation of Turbine Stage Flow Field and Performance at Varying Cavity Purge Rates and Operating Speeds
J. Turbomach (March,2018)
Experimental Study of Ingestion in the Rotor–Stator Disk Cavity of a Subscale Axial Turbine Stage
J. Turbomach (September,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Outlook
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential
Performance Testing of Combined Cycle Power Plant
Handbook for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants, Second Edition
The Special Characteristics of Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential