Abstract

The current trend in turbomachinery toward broader operating characteristics requires that operating points in the off-design region can be captured accordingly from the simulation models. Complex processes like separation and vortex formation/dissipation occur under these conditions. Linear two equation models are often not able to represent these effects correctly since their derivation is based on oversimplifications, such as the Boussinesq hypothesis, which makes it impossible to capture anisotropic turbulence. Advanced RANS models are usually not considered in the design process of turbomachines because (1) they are usually more delicate with regards to stability and convergence behavior and (2) require additional computational effort. To make the usage of advanced RANS models more applicable for complex turbomachinery simulations, a selected group of models were implemented into a robust framework of a pressure-based fully coupled solver. To further enhance stability, coupling terms between the turbulent transport equations were derived for several models. Anisotropic turbulence is introduced by computing an algebraic expression or by solving the transport equations for the Reynolds stress components. The evaluation of the models is performed on the RWTH Aachen “Radiver” centrifugal compressor case with vaned diffuser. For design conditions and operation points near the stability limit, all investigated turbulence models predict the compressor characteristic. Operation points in the choking region, on the other hand, are only predicted well by anisotropic models. The good results and improved convergence behavior of the advanced RANS models clearly indicates their applicability in the design process of turbomachines.

References

1.
Mueller
,
L.
, and
Verstraete
,
T.
,
2017
, “
CAD Integrated Multipoint Adjoint-Based Optimization of a Turbocharger Radial Turbine
,”
Int. J. Turbomach. Propul. Power
,
2
(
3
).
2.
Othmer
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Adjoint Methods for Car Aerodynamics
,”
J. Math. Indus.
,
4
(
1
), p.
6
.
3.
Mueller
,
L.
, and
Verstraete
,
T.
,
2017
, “
CAD Integrated Multipoint Adjoint-Based Optimization of a Turbocharger Radial Turbine
,”
Int. J. Turbomach. Propul. Power
,
2
(
3
), p.
14
.
4.
Wilcox
,
D.
,
1998
,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
, Vol.
2
,
DCW industries La Canada
,
CA
.
5.
Durbin
,
P.
,
1991
, “
Near-Wall Turbulence Closure Modeling Without “Damping Functions
,”
Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
1
13
.
6.
Durbin
,
P.
,
1993
, “
Application of a Near-Wall Turbulence Model to Boundary Layers and Heat Transfer
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
14
(
4
), pp.
316
323
.
7.
Billard
,
F.
, and
Laurence
,
D.
,
2012
, “
A Robust K-ɛ-v2/k Elliptic Blending Turbulence Model Applied to Near-Wall, Separated and Buoyant Flows
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
33
(
1
), pp.
45
58
.
8.
Revell
,
A.
,
Craft
,
T.
, and
Laurence
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Turbulence Modelling of Unsteady Turbulent Flows Using the Stress Strain Lag Model
,”
Flow Turbul. Combust.
,
86
(
1
), pp.
129
151
.
9.
Lardeau
,
S.
, and
Billard
,
F.
,
2016
, “
Development of an Elliptic-Blending Lag Model for Industrial Applications
,”
54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
,
San Diego, CA
,
Jan. 4–8
, p.
1600
.
10.
Biswas
,
R.
,
Durbin
,
P.
, and
Medic
,
G.
,
2019
, “
Development of an Elliptic Blending Lag k-ω Model
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
76
, pp.
26
39
.
11.
Wallin
,
S.
, and
Johansson
,
A.
,
2000
, “
An Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model for Incompressible and Compressible Turbulent Flows
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
403
, pp.
89
132
.
12.
Menter
,
F.
,
Garbaruk
,
A.
, and
Egorov
,
Y.
,
2012
, “
Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Models for Anisotropic Wall-Bounded Flows
,”
Progress in Flight Physics
, Vol.
3
,
EDP Sciences
,
Les Ulis, France
, pp.
89
104
.
13.
Ziegler
,
K.
,
Gallus
,
H.
, and
Niehuis
,
R.
,
2003
, “
A Study on Impeller-Diffuser Interaction—Part I: Influence on the Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
(
1
), pp.
173
182
.
14.
Ziegler
,
K.
,
Gallus
,
H.
, and
Niehuis
,
R.
,
2003
, “
A Study on Impeller-Diffuser Interaction—Part II: Detailed Flow Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
(
1
), pp.
183
192
.
15.
Dufour
,
G.
,
Cazalbou
,
J.
,
Carbonneau
,
X.
, and
Chassaing
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Assessing Rotation/Curvature Corrections to Eddy-Viscosity Models in the Calculations of Centrifugal-Compressor Flows
,”
J. Fluid Eng.
,
130
(
9
), p.
091401
.
16.
Gibson
,
L.
,
Galloway
,
L.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Spence
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Assessment of Turbulence Model Predictions for a Centrifugal Compressor Simulation
,”
J. Global Power Propul. Soc.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
142
156
.
17.
Bourgeois
,
J.
,
Martinuzzi
,
R.
,
Savory
,
E.
,
Zhang
,
C.
, and
Roberts
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Assessment of Turbulence Model Predictions for an Aero-Engine Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
1
), p.
011025
.
18.
Moroz
,
L.
,
Govoruschenko
,
Y.
,
Pagur
,
P.
, and
Romanenko
,
L.
,
2008
, “
Integrated Conceptual Design Environment for Centrifugal Compressors Flow Path Design
,”
ASME 2008 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
,
Boston, MA
,
Oct. 31–Nov. 6
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
, pp.
175
185
.
19.
Ali
,
S.
,
Zhang
,
C.
,
Martinuzzi
,
R.
, and
Lin
,
W.
,
2016
, “
Investigation of the Performance of Turbulence Models With Respect to High Flow Curvature in Centrifugal Compressors
,”
J. Fluid Eng.
,
138
(
5
), p.
051101
.
20.
Mangani
,
L.
,
Casartelli
,
E.
, and
Mauri
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Assessment of Various Turbulence Models in a High Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Compressor With An Object Oriented CFD Code
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
6
), p.
061033
.
21.
Smirnov
,
P.
,
Hansen
,
T.
, and
Menter
,
F.
,
2007
, “
Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flows in Centrifugal Compressor Stages With Different Radial Gaps
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Montreal, Canada
,
May 14–17
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
, pp.
1029
1038
.
22.
Hanimann
,
L.
,
Casartelli
,
E.
, and
Mangani
,
L.
,
2014
, “
Reviewing the Implicit Mixing Plane Approach: Theoretical and Applied Cases
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Düsseldorf, Germany
,
June 16–20
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
.
23.
Hanimann
,
L.
,
Mangani
,
L.
,
Casartelli
,
E.
,
Mokulys
,
T.
, and
Mauri
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Development of a Novel Mixing Plane Interface Using a Fully Implicit Averaging for Stage Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
8
), p.
081010
.
24.
Moukalled
,
F.
,
Mangani
,
L.
, and
Darwish
,
M.
,
2016
,
The Finite Volume Method in Computational Fluid Dynamics
, Vol.
113
,
Springer
,
Cham, Switzerland
.
25.
Wolfshtein
,
M.
,
1969
, “
The Velocity and Temperature Distribution in One-Dimensional Flow With Turbulence Augmentation and Pressure Gradient
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
12
(
3
), pp.
301
318
.
26.
Jongen
,
T.
,
1992
, “
Simulation and Modeling of Turbulent Incompressible Flows
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
EPF Lausanne
,
Lausanne
.
27.
Spalart
,
P.
,
2000
, “
Strategies for Turbulence Modelling and Simulations
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
21
(
3
), pp.
252
263
.
28.
Roos Launchbury
,
D.
,
Mangani
,
L.
,
Casartelli
,
E.
, and
Del Citto
,
F.
,
2021
, “
A Robust Implementation of a Reynolds Stress Model for Turbomachinery Applications in a Coupled Solver Environment
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
143
(
9
), p.
091008
.
29.
Menter
,
F.
,
1993
, “
Zonal Two Equation KW Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference
,
Orlando, FL
,
July 6–9
, p.
2906
.
30.
Kalitzin
,
G.
,
Medic
,
G.
,
Iaccarino
,
G.
, and
Durbin
,
P.
,
2005
, “
Near-Wall Behavior of RANS Turbulence Models and Implications for Wall Functions
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
204
(
1
), pp.
265
291
.
31.
Mangani
,
L.
,
Buchmayr
,
M.
, and
Darwish
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Development of a Novel Fully Coupled Solver in Openfoam: Steady-State Incompressible Turbulent Flows
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundam.
,
66
(
1
), pp.
1
20
.
32.
Almohammadi
,
K.
,
2020
, “
Assessment of Reattachment Length Using Turbulence Models on Backward Facing Step (BFS) for Turbulent Flow With Modified General Richardson Method
,”
Arabian J. Sci. Eng.
,
45
(
11
), pp.
9293
9303
.
33.
Menter
,
F.
,
1992
, “Improved Two-Equation k-Omega Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows,” NASA Sti/Recon Technical Report N,
93
, p.
22809
.
34.
Casartelli
,
E.
,
Mangani
,
L.
,
Del Rio
,
A.
, and
Schmid
,
A.
,
2019
, “
Capturing s-Shape of Pump-Turbines by CFD Simulations Using an Anisotropic Turbulence Model
,”
ASME-JSME-KSME 2019 8th Joint Fluids Engineering Conference
,
San Francisco, CA
,
July 28–Aug. 1
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
.
You do not currently have access to this content.