Abstract

This paper investigates the surface boundary layer and wake development of a compressor blade at a range of low Reynolds number from 45,000 to 120,000. Experiments in a miniature linear compressor cascade facility have been performed with detailed surface pressure measurements and flow visualization to track variations in the separation bubble size. These have been combined with high-resolution pneumatic pressure and hot-wire probe traverses in the downstream wake. High-fidelity direct numerical simulations have been completed on the same compressor blade section across the same range of operating conditions. The results show that large laminar separation bubbles exist on both blade surfaces. As Reynolds number increases, these separation bubbles shorten in length and reduce in thickness. Correspondingly, the downstream wake narrows, although the peak wake loss coefficient remains approximately constant. As the Reynolds number is increased from 45,000 to 120,000, the bubble length on the suction side reduced from 48% to 28% chord and on the pressure side reduced from 35% to 20% chord, while the loss coefficient reduced from 9% to 5%. The flow features are examined further within the high-fidelity computations, which reveal the dependence of the wake turbulence on the laminar separation bubbles. The separation bubbles are found to generate turbulent kinetic energy, which convects downstream to form the outer part of wake. As Re increases, a shorter bubble produces less turbulence in the outer part of the boundary layer leading to a narrower wake. However, the trailing edge separation is largely independent of Reynolds number, leading to the constant peak loss coefficient observed. The overall loss is shown to vary linearly with the total turbulence production, and this depends on the size of the separation bubbles. Overall, this research provides new insight into the connection between the blade surface flow field and the wake characteristics at low Reynolds number. The findings suggest that changes that minimize the extent of the blade separation bubbles could provide significant improvements to both the steady and unsteady properties of the wake.

References

1.
O'Meara
,
M.
, and
Mueller
,
T. J.
,
1987
, “
Laminar Separation Bubble Characteristics on an Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers
,”
AIAA J.
,
25
(
8
), pp.
1033
1041
.
2.
Hu
,
H.
, and
Yang
,
Z.
,
2008
, “
An Experimental Study of the Laminar Flow Separation on a Low-Reynolds-Number Airfoil
,”
ASME J. Fluid. Eng.
,
130
(
5
), p.
051101
.
3.
Pröbsting
,
S.
, and
Yarusevych
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Laminar Separation Bubble Development on an Airfoil Emitting Tonal Noise
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
780
, pp.
167
191
.
4.
Lambert
,
A.
, and
Yarusevych
,
S.
,
2019
, “
Effect of Angle of Attack on Vortex Dynamics in Laminar Separation Bubbles
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
31
(
6
), p.
064105
.
5.
Maffioli
,
A.
,
Hall
,
C.
, and
Melvin
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Axial Compressor Sections
,”
Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
,
Kissimmee, FL
,
Jan. 5–9
.
6.
Lin
,
J. C. M.
, and
Pauley
,
L. L.
,
1996
, “
Low-Reynolds-Number Separation on an Airfoil
,”
AIAA J.
,
34
(
8
), pp.
1570
1577
.
7.
Yarusevych
,
S.
,
Sullivan
,
P. E.
, and
Kawall
,
J. G.
,
2006
, “
Coherent Structures in an Airfoil Boundary Layer and Wake at Low Reynolds Numbers
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
18
(
4
), p.
044101
.
8.
McAuliffe
,
B. R.
, and
Yaras
,
M. I.
,
2010
, “
Transition Mechanisms in Separation Bubbles Under Low- and Elevated-Freestream Turbulence
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(
1
), p.
011004
.
9.
Huang
,
R. F.
, and
Lin
,
C. L.
,
1995
, “
Vortex Shedding and Shear-Layer Instability of Wing at Low-Reynolds Numbers
,”
AIAA J.
,
33
(
8
), pp.
1398
1403
.
10.
Kim
,
D.-H.
,
Yang
,
J.-H.
,
Chang
,
J.-W.
, and
Chung
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Boundary Layer and Near-Wake Measurements of NACA 0012 Airfoil at low Reynolds Numbers
,”
Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
,
Orlando, FL
,
Jan. 5–8
.
11.
Alam
,
M. M.
,
Zhou
,
Y.
,
Yang
,
H. X.
,
Guo
,
H.
, and
Mi
,
J.
,
2009
, “
The Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Wake
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
48
(
1
), pp.
81
103
.
12.
Huang
,
R. F.
, and
Lee
,
H. W.
,
2000
, “
Turbulence Effect on Frequency Characteristics of Unsteady Motions in Wake of Wing
,”
AIAA J.
,
38
(
1
), pp.
87
94
.
13.
Sieverding
,
C.
, and
Hirsch
,
C.
,
1993
, “
Advanced Methods for Cascade Testing
,”
AGARDograph
,
328
, pp.
22
34
.
14.
Przytarski
,
P. J.
, and
Wheeler
,
A. P.
,
2018
, “
Accurate Prediction of Loss Using High Fidelity Methods
,”
Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Vol. 51012, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
Oslo, Norway
.
15.
Wheeler
,
A. P. S.
,
Dickens
,
A. M. J.
, and
Miller
,
R. J.
,
2018
, “
The Effect of Nonequilibrium Boundary Layers on Compressor Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
10
), p.
101003
.
16.
Uranga
,
A.
,
Persson
,
P. O.
,
Drela
,
M.
, and
Peraire
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Implicit Large Eddy Simulation of Transition to Turbulence at Low Reynolds Numbers Using a Discontinuous Galerkin Method
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
87
(
1–5
), pp.
232
261
.
17.
Phillips
,
L.
, and
Fyfe
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Turbid: A Routine for Generating Random Turbulent Inflow Data
,”
Naval Research Lab Vin Inlet Velocity Laboratory Report, Washington DC, Lab For Computational Physics and Fluid
.
18.
Przytarski
,
P. J.
, and
Wheeler
,
A. P.
,
2019
, “
The Effect of Rotor-Stator Gap on Repeating-Stage Compressor Loss
,”
Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Vol. 58554, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
Phoenix, AZ
,
June 17–21
.
19.
Brendel
,
M.
, and
Mueller
,
T. J.
,
1988
, “
Boundary-Layer Measurements on an Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers
,”
J. Aircr.
,
25
(
7
), pp.
612
617
.
20.
Wynnychuk
,
D. W.
, and
Yarusevych
,
S.
,
2020
, “
Characterization of Laminar Separation Bubbles Using Infrared Thermography
,”
AIAA J.
,
58
(
7
), pp.
2831
2843
.
You do not currently have access to this content.