Abstract

Minimizing the losses within a low-pressure turbine (LPT) system is critical for the design of next-generation ultra-high bypass ratio aero-engines. The stator-well cavity windage torque can be a significant source of loss within the system, influenced by the ingestion of mainstream annulus air with a tangential velocity opposite to that of the rotor. This paper presents experimental and numerical results of three carefully designed Flow Control Concepts (FCCs)—additional geometric features on the stator surfaces, which were optimized to minimize the windage torque within a scaled, engine-representative stator-well cavity. FCC1 and FCC2 featured rows of guide vanes at the inlet to the downstream and upstream wheel-spaces, respectively. FCC3 combined FCC1 and FCC2. Superposed flows were introduced to the upstream section of the cavity, which modelled the low-radius coolant and higher radius leakage between the rotor blades. In addition to torque measurements, total and static pressures were collected, from which the cavity swirl ratio was derived. Additional swirl measurements were collected using a five-hole aerodynamic probe, which traversed radially at the entrance and exit of the cavity. A cavity windage torque reduction of 55% on the baseline (which has no flow control) was measured for FCC3, at the design condition with superposed flow. For this concept, an increase in the cavity swirl in both the upstream and downstream wheel-spaces was demonstrated experimentally and numerically. With increasing superposed flow, the contribution of FCC1 surpassed FCC2, due to more mass flow entering the downstream wheel-space across the rotor fins (passing FCC1), and less ingestion from the annulus into the upstream wheel-space (passing FCC2). The torque changes from the concepts are explained using the fluid dynamic evidence from experimental swirl measurements and computational simulations. The simulations allow translation to engine-operating conditions and practical information to the engine designer.

References

1.
Jackson
,
R.
,
Lock
,
G. D.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
,
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
Li
,
Z.
,
Christodoulou
,
L.
,
Jefferson-Loveday
,
R.
, and
Ambrose
,
S.
,
2023
, “
Influence of Swirl and Ingress on Windage Losses in a Low-Pressure Turbine Stator-Well Cavity
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
64
(
11
), p. 173.
2.
Eastwood
,
D.
,
Coren
,
D. D.
,
Long
,
C. A.
,
Atkins
,
N. R.
,
Childs
,
P. R. N.
,
Scanlon
,
T. J.
, and
Guijarro-Valencia
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Experimental Investigation of Turbine Stator Well Rim Seal, Re-Ingestion and Interstage Seal Flows Using Gas Concentration Techniques and Displacement Measurements
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
8
), p.
082501
.
3.
Coren
,
D. D.
,
Atkins
,
N. R.
,
Turner
,
J. R.
,
Eastwood
,
D. E.
,
Davies
,
S.
,
Child
,
P. R. N.
,
Dixon
,
J. A.
, and
Scanlon
,
T. J.
,
2013
, “
An Advanced Multiconfiguration Stator Well Cooling Test Facility
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
1
), p.
011003
.
4.
Liu
,
H.
,
An
,
Y.
, and
Zou
,
Z.
,
2014
, “
Aerothermal Analysis of a Turbine With Rim Seal Cavity
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2014
,
Dusseldorf, Germany
,
June 16–20
, ASME Paper No. GT2014-25276.
5.
Banihabib
,
R.
, and
Poursamad
,
A.
,
2019
, “
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Rim Cavity Sealing Performance in a Turbine Stator Well
,”
Proceedings of the GPPS Technical Conference
,
Zurich, Switzerland
,
Jan. 16–17
, Paper No. GPPS-TC-2019-0059.
6.
Andreini
,
A.
,
Da Soghe
,
R.
, and
Facchini
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Turbine Stator Well CFD Studies: Effects of Coolant Supply Geometry on Cavity Sealing Performance
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
2
), p.
021008
.
7.
Coren
,
D. D.
,
Atkins
,
N. R.
,
Long
,
C. A.
,
Eastwood
,
D.
,
Childs
,
P. R. N.
,
Guijarro-Valencia
,
A.
, and
Dixon
,
J. A.
,
2011
, “
The Influence of Turbine Stator Well Coolant Flow Rate and Passage Configuration on Cooling Effectiveness
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2011
,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
,
June 6–10
, ASME Paper No. GT2011-46448.
8.
Zhang
,
F.
,
Wang
,
X.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Zheng
,
D.
,
2017
, “
Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Radial Location of Sealing Air Inlet and Its Geometry on the Sealing Performance of a Stator-Well Cavity
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
115
(Part B), pp.
820
832
.
9.
Pohl
,
J.
,
Thompson
,
H. M.
,
Guijarro Valencia
,
A.
,
López Juste
,
G.
,
Fico
,
V.
, and
Clayton
,
G. A.
,
2017
, “
Structural Deflection’s Impact in Turbine Stator Well Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
139
(
4
), p.
041901
.
10.
Pohl
,
J.
,
Thompson
,
H.
,
Schlaps
,
R.
,
Shahpar
,
S.
,
Fico
,
V.
, and
Clayton
,
G.
,
2016
, “
Innovative Turbine Stator Well Design Using Design Optimisation
,”
Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery
,
Honolulu, HI
,
April
, Paper No. HAL-01887489.
11.
Hunter
,
S. D.
, and
Manwaring
,
S. R.
,
2000
, “
Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine: Part I—Experimental and Numerical Investigation
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2000
,
Munich, Germany
,
May 8–11
, ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-651.
12.
Gier
,
J.
,
Stubert
,
B.
,
Brouillet
,
B.
, and
De Vito
,
L.
,
2005
, “
Interaction of Shroud Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
127
(
4
), pp.
649
658
.
13.
Schrewe
,
S.
,
Werschnik
,
H.
, and
Schiffer
,
H. P.
,
2013
, “
Experimental Analysis of the Interaction Between Rim Seal and Main Annulus Flow in a Low Pressure Two Stage Axial Turbine
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
5
), p.
051003
.
14.
Guida
,
R.
,
Lengani
,
D.
,
Simoni
,
D.
,
Ubaldi
,
M.
, and
Zunino
,
P.
,
2018
, “
New Facility Setup for the Investigation of Cooling Flow, Viscous and Rotational Effects on the Interstage Seal Flow Behavior of a Gas Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2018
,
Oslo, Norway
,
June 11–15
, ASME Paper No. GT2018-75630.
15.
Barsi
,
D.
,
Lengani
,
D.
,
Simoni
,
D.
,
Venturino
,
G.
,
Bertini
,
F.
,
Giovannini
,
M.
, and
Rubechini
,
F.
,
2022
, “
Analysis of the Loss Production Mechanism Due to Cavity–Main Flow Interaction in a Low-Pressure Turbine Stage
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
144
(
9
), p.
091004
.
16.
Andreini
,
A.
,
Da Soghe
,
R.
,
Facchini
,
B.
, and
Zecchi
,
S.
,
2008
, “
Turbine Stator Well CFD Studies: Effects of Cavity Cooling Air Flow
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2008
,
Berlin, Germany
,
June 9–13
, ASME Paper No. GT2008-51067.
17.
Mahle
,
I.
,
2010
, “
Improving the Interaction Between Leakage Flows and Main Flow in a Low Pressure Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2010
,
Galsgow, UK
,
June 14–18
, ASME Paper No. GT2010-22448.
18.
Rosic
,
B.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
,
2008
, “
Control of Shroud Leakage Loss by Reducing Circumferential Mixing
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
130
(
2
), p.
021010
.
19.
Rosic
,
B.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
,
Curtis
,
E. M.
, and
Peterson
,
A. T.
,
2008
, “
The Influence of Shroud and Cavity Geometry on Turbine Performance: An Experimental and Computational Study—Part II: Exit Cavity Geometry
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
130
(
4
), p.
041002
.
20.
Wallis
,
A. M.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
,
2000
, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio, Shrouded Axial Flow Turbine
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
123
(
2
), pp.
334
341
.
21.
Gao
,
J.
,
Zheng
,
Q.
,
Yue
,
G.
, and
Sun
,
L.
,
2012
, “
Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Mixing Losses in a Shrouded Axial Turbine
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
226
(
5
), pp.
1263
1277
.
22.
Li
,
Z.
,
Christodoulou
,
L.
,
Jefferson-Loveday
,
R.
,
Ambrose
,
S.
,
Jackson
,
R.
,
Lock
,
G. D.
,
Sangan
,
C. M.
, and
Scobie
,
J. A.
,
2023
, “
Windage Reduction in Low Pressure Turbine Cavities. Part I: Flow Control Concept Design Using Numerical Modelling
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2023
, ASME Paper No. GT2023-103532.
You do not currently have access to this content.