Abstract

Targets to reduce fuel consumption and reduce CO2 emissions have been met using engine downsizing and turbocharging. In automotive applications, it is important that the turbocharger responds well to transient events and operates efficiently at both the design and off-design conditions. A mixed flow turbine (MFT) is not constrained to a radial inlet blade angle, allowing the peak efficiency to be shifted to a lower U/C_is, providing additional freedom to the designer. As the MFT leading edge varies in radius, the spanwise incidence angle also varies, leading to additional separation on the suction surface (SS) of the blade near the hub because of increasingly positive incidence, which is most noticeable at off-design conditions. A multi-scroll volute was previously paired with an MFT with a 45-deg blade cone angle (Λ), which generated a non-uniform spanwise flow that improved efficiency at off-design at the cost of peak efficiency. The current study identified the range of blade cone angles that benefitted from a multi-scroll volute to reduce incidence at the hub region. A numerical investigation was conducted, which determined the influence a multi-scroll volute can have on MFTs with varying levels of blade cone angle. When the MFT with a large blade cone angle (Λ = 60 deg) was paired with a multi-scroll volute, the efficiency improved by 2.2%pts at design and 0.5%pts at off-design conditions. The incidence improved, and the mass flowrate increased at the hub region. The MFT with a smaller blade cone angle (Λ = 30 deg) had performance losses at both operating conditions because the multi-scroll volute increased incidence within the hub region, which reduced the peak efficiency by 1.3%pts. The off-design condition had an excessively positive incidence angle, which was further increased at the hub region by the multi-scroll volute. This resulted in a 0.8%pts reduction in off-design efficiency. The multi-scroll volute concept was shown to offer efficiency improvements for MFTs with larger blade cone angles through better management of the non-uniform spanwise velocity distribution at the rotor inlet.

References

1.
Whitfield
,
A.
, and
Baines
,
N. C.
,
1990
,
Design of Radial Turbomachines
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
Harlow, Essex, UK
.
2.
Roclawski
,
H.
,
Böhle
,
M.
, and
Gugau
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Mixed Flow Turbine Wheel
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
, ASME Paper No. GT2012-68233.
3.
Leonard
,
T.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Starke
,
A.
, and
Filsinger
,
D.
,
2019
, “
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Mixed Flow Turbine Inlet Cone Angle and Inlet Blade Angle
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
141
(
8
), p.
081001
.
4.
Baines
,
N. C.
, and
Yeo
,
J.
,
1990
, “
Pulsating Flow Behaviour in a Twin Entry Vaneless Radial Inflow Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 4th International Conference on Turbochargers and Turbocharging
,
London, UK
,
May 22–24
, pp.
113
122
.
5.
Abidat
,
M.
,
Baines
,
N. C.
, and
Firth
,
M. R.
,
1992
, “
Design of a Highly Loaded Mixed Flow Turbine
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. A: J. Power Energy
,
206
(
2
), pp.
95
107
.
6.
Arcoumanis
,
C.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R. F.
,
Nouri
,
J. M.
, and
Su
,
C. C.
,
1997
, “
Inlet and Exit Flow Characteristics of Mixed Flow Turbines
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
,
3
(
4
), pp.
277
293
.
7.
Lee
,
S. P.
,
Jupp
,
M. L.
,
Nickson
,
A. K.
, and
Allport
,
J. M.
,
2017
, “
Analysis of a Tilted Turbine Housing Volute Design Under Pulsating Inlet Conditions
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
,
Charlotte, NC
,
June 26–30
.
8.
Lee
,
S. P.
,
Barrans
,
S. M.
,
Jupp
,
M. L.
, and
Nickson
,
A. K.
,
2018
, “
Investigation Into the Impact of Span-Wise Flow Distribution on the Performance of a Mixed Flow Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
,
Oslo, Norway
,
June 11–15
.
9.
Morrison
,
R.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
, and
Leonard
,
T.
,
2016
, “
Investigation of the Effects of Flow Conditions at Rotor Inlet on Mixed Flow Turbine Performance for Automotive Applications
,”
NLETT Turbocharging Seminar
,
Tianjin, China
,
Sept. 21–22
, pp.
1
12
.
10.
Morrison
,
R.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S. I.
,
Leonard
,
T.
, and
Starke
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Evaluating the Use of Leaned Stator Vanes to Produce a Non-Uniform Flow Distribution Across the Inlet Span of a Mixed Flow Turbine Rotor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
142
(
12
), p.
121001
.
11.
Morrison
,
R.
,
Stuart
,
C.
,
Kim
,
S. I.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Starke
,
A.
, and
Leonard
,
T.
,
2023
, “
Investigation of a Novel Turbine Housing to Produce a Non-Uniform Spanwise Flow Field at the Inlet to a Mixed Flow Turbine and Provide Variable Geometry Capabilities
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
145
(
6
), p.
061013
.
12.
Capobianco
,
M.
, and
Gambarotta
,
A.
,
1993
, “
Performance of a Twin-Entry Automotive Turbocharger Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the 16th Annual ASME Energy-Sources Technology Conference and Exhibition
,
Houston, TX
,
Jan. 31– Feb. 4
, pp.
1
10
.
13.
Walkingshaw
,
J.
,
Spence
,
S.
,
Ehrhard
,
J.
, and
Thornhill
,
D.
,
2013
, “
An Experimental Assessment of the Effects of Stator Vane Tip Clearance Location and Back Swept Blading on an Automotive Variable Geometry Turbocharger
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
6
), p.
061001
.
14.
ANSYS Inc.
,
2019
,
CFX Solver Theory Guide
,
ANSYS
, p.
59
.
Release 2019-R3
.
15.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
1993
, “
Zonal Two Equation k-ω Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows
,” AIAA Paper No. 93-2906.
16.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
1994
, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.
17.
Roache
,
P. J.
,
1998
,
Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering
,
Hermosa Publishers
,
Albuquerque, NM
.
18.
Celik
,
I. B.
,
Ghia
,
U.
,
Roache
,
P. J.
,
Freitas
,
C. J.
,
Coleman
,
H.
, and
Raad
,
P. E.
,
2008
, “
Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
130
(
7
), p.
078001
.
19.
Kock
,
F.
, and
Herwig
,
H.
,
2005
, “
Entropy Production Calculation for Turbulent Shear Flows and Their Implementation in CFD Codes
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
26
(
4
), pp.
672
680
.
You do not currently have access to this content.