Abstract

The present article numerically investigates the design space of an axial, low-speed compressor stage using tandem and single aerofoil configurations. The investigated rotor and stator designs follow a coupled throughflow and blade-to-blade design approach and will yield quasi-3D designed compressor stages with either single-rotor single-stator or tandem-rotor tandem-stator configurations. In past studies, tandem aerofoil configurations have shown a potential for increasing stage working coefficients, while maintaining their efficiency compared to their single aerofoil reference configuration. However, it was also shown that tandem configurations are able to reduce efficiency due to an increase of secondary flow caused by the higher loading and introduction in the second aerofoil. Currently, there is no clear design guideline on when tandem aerofoil configurations should be preferred over single ones, and under which circumstances they should be avoided. To answer this question, the present article will attempt to create a “Smith chart” for tandem aerofoil stages and compare them to their single aerofoil counterparts. Originally intended for use with turbine stages, the Smith chart maps out the potential efficiencies of turbomachinery designs. It plots the working coefficient (Ψ) over the throughflow coefficient (φ), which gives a direct indication of the shape of velocity triangles in the stage. However, the Smith chart has been well investigated for single aerofoil stages, both numerically and experimentally, as well as for low- and high-speed applications, and this is not the case so far for tandem configurations. The current work presents a fast Q3D design and analysis procedure used on a low-speed axial compressor stage and will yield quasi-3D efficiencies for a large number of different design coefficients. The findings of this work will enable future research to identify preferred combinations of design coefficients for tandem aerofoil configurations, which can then be further analyzed in 3D investigations at a higher fidelity level.

References

1.
Sieverding
,
F.
,
Ribi
,
B.
,
Casey
,
M.
, and
Meyer
,
M.
,
2004
, “
Design of Industrial Axial Compressor Blade Sections for Optimal Range and Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
(
2
), pp.
323
331
.
2.
Dickens
,
T.
, and
Day
,
I.
,
2011
, “
The Design of Highly Loaded Axial Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
3
), p.
031007
.
3.
McGlumphy
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Numerical Investigation of Subsonic Axial-Flow Tandem Airfoils for a Core Compressor Rotor
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Virginia Polytechnic And State University
,
Blacksburg, VA
.
4.
Baumert
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Abschätzung der Strömungsverluste in Verdichter-Tandemgittern
,”
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft-und Raumfahrt-Lilienthal-Oberth eV
,
Bonn, Germany
.
5.
Hergt
,
A.
, and
Siller
,
U.
,
2016
, “
About Subsonic Compressor Tandem Aerodynamics—A Fundamental Study
,”
ISROMAC
,
Honolulu, HI
,
Apr. 10-15
.
6.
Eckel
,
J.
, and
Guemmer
,
V.
,
2021
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Aerodynamic Performance of Hybrid Aerofoils in A 1.5-Stage Low-Speed Compressor
,”
ASME Turbo Expo
,
Virtual Online
,
June 7–11
.
7.
Straccia
,
M.
, and
Gümmer
,
V.
,
2021
, “
Numerical Investigation of Non-Axisymmetric End Wall Contouring Effects in a Low-Speed Compressor Tandem Stator
,”
European Turbomachinery Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics
,
Gdansk, Poland
,
April 2021
.
8.
Hall
,
D.
,
Greitzer
,
E.
, and
Tan
,
C.
,
2012
, “
Performance Limits of Axial Compressor Stages
,”
ASME Turbo Expo
,
Copenhagen, Denmark
,
June 11-15
.
9.
Anderson
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Comprehensive Smith Charts for Axial Compressor Design
,”
ASME Turbo Expo
,
Phoenix, AZ
,
June 17-21
.
10.
Hopfinger
,
M.
, and
Guemmer
,
V.
,
2019
, “
Preliminary Design of a Three-Stage Low-Speed Research Compressor Using Tandem Vanes
,” AIAA Propulsion And Energy, Paper No. AIAA 2019-3909.
11.
Drela
,
M.
, and
Youngren
,
H.
,
1998
, “A User’s Guide to MISES 2.53,”
Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
,
Cambridge, MA
.
12.
Franke
,
M.
,
Kügeler
,
E.
, and
Nürnberger
,
D.
,
2005
, “
Das DLR-Verfahren TRACE: Moderne Simulationstechniken für Turbomaschinenströmungen
,”
Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress
,
Friedrichshafen
,
Sept. 26–29
.
13.
Lieblein
,
S.
,
Schwenk
,
F.
, and
Broderick
,
R.
,
2005
, “Diffusion Factor for Estimating Losses and Limiting Blade Loadings in Axial-Flow-Compressor Blade Elements,”
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics
,
Cleveland, OH
, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Cleveland OH, Lewis Flight …, 1953).
14.
Drela
,
M.
,
2010
, “A User’s Guide to MTFLOW 2.01,”
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
,
Cambridge, MA
.
15.
Celik
,
I.
,
Ghia
,
U.
,
Roache
,
P.
, and
Freitas
,
C.
,
2008
, “
Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
130
(
7
), p.
078001
.
16.
Banjac
,
M.
,
Petrovic
,
M.
, and
Wiedermann
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Secondary Flows, Endwall Effects, and Stall Detection in Axial Compressor Design
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
5
), p.
051004
.
17.
Holloway
,
P.
,
Koch
,
C.
,
Knight
,
G.
, and
Shaffer
,
S.
,
1982
, “
Energy Efficient Engine. High Pressure Compressor Detail Design Report
,” NASA Contractor Report, May 1.
18.
Lieblein
,
S.
,
1960
, “
Incidence and Deviation-Angle Correlations for Compressor Cascades
,”
J. Basic. Eng.
,
82
(
3
), pp.
575
584
.
19.
Corralejo
,
R.
, and
Harley
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Smith Diagram for Low Reynolds Number Axial Fan Rotors
,” 12th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics & Thermodynamics.
20.
Singh
,
A.
, and
Mistry
,
C.
,
2019
, “
Study on Effect of Axial Overlap on Tip Leakage Flow Structure in Tandem Bladed Low Speed Axial Flow Compressor
,” ASME Turbo Expo 2019, Paper No. GT2019-91366.
You do not currently have access to this content.